[PATCH 2/2] arm64: kernel: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

[Jingoo Han]

For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts()
instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch
warning.

  WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
index c8e9eff..4507691 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 			seq_printf(m, "%s ", hwcap_str[i]);
 
 	seq_printf(m, "\nCPU implementer\t: 0x%02x\n", read_cpuid_id() >> 24);
-	seq_printf(m, "CPU architecture: AArch64\n");
+	seq_puts(m, "CPU architecture: AArch64\n");
 	seq_printf(m, "CPU variant\t: 0x%x\n", (read_cpuid_id() >> 20) & 15);
 	seq_printf(m, "CPU part\t: 0x%03x\n", (read_cpuid_id() >> 4) & 0xfff);
 	seq_printf(m, "CPU revision\t: %d\n", read_cpuid_id() & 15);
-- 
1.7.10.4