[PATCH v2 1/6] audit: Enable arm64 support
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Mon Jan 27 09:49:23 EST 2014
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:12:33AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> [To audit maintainers]
>
> On 01/23/2014 11:18 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:13:14AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> >> @@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ enum {
> >> /* distinguish syscall tables */
> >> #define __AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT 0x80000000
> >> #define __AUDIT_ARCH_LE 0x40000000
> >> +#define AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64 (EM_AARCH64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
> >> +#define AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64EB (EM_AARCH64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT)
> >> #define AUDIT_ARCH_ALPHA (EM_ALPHA|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
> >> #define AUDIT_ARCH_ARM (EM_ARM|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
> >> #define AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB (EM_ARM)
> >> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> >> index 79383d3..3aae602 100644
> >> --- a/init/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> >> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ config AUDIT
> >>
> >> config AUDITSYSCALL
> >> bool "Enable system-call auditing support"
> >> - depends on AUDIT && (X86 || PARISC || PPC || S390 || IA64 || UML || SPARC64 || SUPERH || (ARM && AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT))
> >> + depends on AUDIT && (X86 || PARISC || PPC || S390 || IA64 || UML || SPARC64 || SUPERH || (ARM && AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT) || ARM64)
> >
> > The usual comment for such changes: could you please clean this up and
> > just use something like "depends on HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL"?
>
> Do you agree to this change?
>
> If so, I can create a patch, but have some concerns:
> 1) I can't verify it on other architectures than (arm &) arm64.
You could try to build. It's really a trivial change, could get away
with code inspection (and some automatic building when it gets to
linux-next).
In init/Kconfig:
config HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
bool
and:
- depends on AUDIT && (X86 || PARISC || PPC || S390 || IA64 || UML || SPARC64 || SUPERH || (ARM && AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT))
+ depends on HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
In the corresponding arch/*/Kconfig:
select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
> 2) Some architectures (microblaze, mips, openrisc) are not listed here, but
For those, you don't need to select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL.
> their ptrace.c have a call to audit_syscall_entry/exit().
> (audit_syscall_entry/exit are null if !AUDITSYSCALL, though)
They are not NULL but empty inline functions, so they don't have any
effect.
> So I'm afraid that the change might break someone's assumption.
I'm pretty sure it won't ;).
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list