[PATCH V2 04/10] clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
Tomasz Figa
t.figa at samsung.com
Thu Jan 23 13:24:01 EST 2014
Hi Rahul,
The patch looks mostly fine now, but I still have one inline comment.
On 07.01.2014 13:59, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Samsung CCF helper functions do not provide support to
> register multiple Clock Providers for a given SoC. Due to
> this limitation SoC platforms are not able to use these
> helpers for registering multiple clock providers and are
> forced to bypass this layer.
>
> This layer is modified accordingly to enable the support.
>
> Clock file for exynos4, exynos5250, exynos5420, exynos5440
[snip]
> /* setup the essentials required to support clock lookup using ccf */
> -void __init samsung_clk_init(struct device_node *np, void __iomem *base,
> - unsigned long nr_clks)
> +struct samsung_clk_provider *__init samsung_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
> + void __iomem *base, unsigned long nr_clks)
> {
> - reg_base = base;
> + struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx;
> + struct clk **clk_table;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct samsung_clk_provider), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctx)
> + panic("could not allocate clock provider context.\n");
>
> clk_table = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk *) * nr_clks, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!clk_table)
> panic("could not allocate clock lookup table\n");
>
> + ctx->reg_base = base;
> + ctx->clk_data.clks = clk_table;
> + ctx->clk_data.clk_num = nr_clks;
> + ctx->lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lock);
spin_lock_init(&ctx->lock);
Best regards,
Tomasz
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list