[RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64: KVM: trap VM system registers until MMU and caches are ON
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Mon Jan 20 08:41:58 EST 2014
Hi Anup,
On 20/01/14 12:00, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com> wrote:
>> In order to be able to detect the point where the guest enables
>> its MMU and caches, trap all the VM related system registers.
>>
>> Once we see the guest enabling both the MMU and the caches, we
>> can go back to a saner mode of operation, which is to leave these
>> registers in complete control of the guest.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 3 ++-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> index c98ef47..fd0a651 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
>> * RW: 64bit by default, can be overriden for 32bit VMs
>> * TAC: Trap ACTLR
>> * TSC: Trap SMC
>> + * TVM: Trap VM ops (until M+C set in SCTLR_EL1)
>> * TSW: Trap cache operations by set/way
>> * TWE: Trap WFE
>> * TWI: Trap WFI
>> @@ -74,7 +75,7 @@
>> * SWIO: Turn set/way invalidates into set/way clean+invalidate
>> */
>> #define HCR_GUEST_FLAGS (HCR_TSC | HCR_TSW | HCR_TWE | HCR_TWI | HCR_VM | \
>> - HCR_BSU_IS | HCR_FB | HCR_TAC | \
>> + HCR_TVM | HCR_BSU_IS | HCR_FB | HCR_TAC | \
>> HCR_AMO | HCR_IMO | HCR_FMO | \
>> HCR_SWIO | HCR_TIDCP | HCR_RW)
>> #define HCR_VIRT_EXCP_MASK (HCR_VA | HCR_VI | HCR_VF)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> index 02e9d09..5e92b9e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,42 @@ done:
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> + * Generic accessor for VM registers. Only called as long as HCR_TVM
>> + * is set.
>> + */
>> +static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + const struct sys_reg_params *p,
>> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>> +{
>> + BUG_ON(!p->is_write);
>> +
>> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * SCTLR_EL1 accessor. Only called as long as HCR_TVM is set. If the
>> + * guest enables the MMU, we stop trapping the VM sys_regs and leave
>> + * it in complete control of the caches.
>> + */
>> +static bool access_sctlr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + const struct sys_reg_params *p,
>> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long val;
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(!p->is_write);
>> +
>> + val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
>> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
>> +
>> + if ((val & (0b101)) == 0b101) /* MMU+Caches enabled? */
>> + vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 &= ~HCR_TVM;
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> * We could trap ID_DFR0 and tell the guest we don't support performance
>> * monitoring. Unfortunately the patch to make the kernel check ID_DFR0 was
>> * NAKed, so it will read the PMCR anyway.
>> @@ -185,32 +221,32 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>> NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>> /* SCTLR_EL1 */
>> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0001), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000),
>> - NULL, reset_val, SCTLR_EL1, 0x00C50078 },
>> + access_sctlr_el1, reset_val, SCTLR_EL1, 0x00C50078 },
>
> This patch in its current form breaks Aarch32 VMs on Foundation v8 Model
> because encoding for Aarch64 VM registers we get Op0=0b11 and for Aarch32
> VM registers we get Op0=0b00 when trapped.
>
> Either its a Foundation v8 Model bug or we need to add more enteries in
> sys_reg_desc[] for Aarch32 VM registers with Op0=0b00.
That's a good point. But Op0 isn't defined for AArch32, the value is
simply hardcoded in kvm_handle_cp15_32/kvm_handle_cp15_64, which is
obviously horribly broken.
I'll work on a fix for that, thanks noticing it.
Does this series otherwise fix your L3 cache issue (assuming you stick
to 64bit guests)?
Cheers,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list