[PATCH v4 0/7] mtd: spi-nor: add a new framework for SPI NOR

Huang Shijie shijie8 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 18 21:44:06 EST 2014


On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:40:09PM +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> Hi Shijie,
> 
> >From: Jagan Teki [mailto:jagannadh.teki at gmail.com]
> [...]
> >
> >I feel these are good points to discuss all.
> >1. With new framework seems like we need two separate controller drivers
> >    one for non spi-nor and one for spi-nor with single controller hw
> >2. With spi-nor implementation though the hw is spi complaint but the sw is
> >   completely ignoring the Linux SPI core interaction.
> >
> >I feel above two points are technically wrong - Please correct me if am wrong
> >but need all developers will join..thanks!
> >
> I have been following this patch-set from sometime, And I think point (2)
> has been discussed back and forth in multiple times in earlier discussions.
> So, Is it possible for you to summarize point (2) with all pros-n-cons ?
> 
> - A README will helpful to clear all doubts and will ease your implementation
>   as well.
> - It will also help in reducing turn-around time to get this framework in
>    acceptable state and still keep it generic enough.
> 
> You can submit the README as Documentation/mtd/spi-nor.txt
okay.

thanks
Huang Shijie



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list