More GPIO madness on iMX6 - and the crappy ARM port of Linux
Eric Nelson
eric.nelson at boundarydevices.com
Fri Jan 17 14:13:12 EST 2014
Hi Russell,
On 01/17/2014 11:47 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> So, we have this wonderful GPIO layer which abstracts GPIO stuff and
> hides stuff. It's really wonderful, because you don't have to care
> about how the GPIOs are actually accessed in drivers anymore.
>
> However, what about the behaviour of GPIOs?
>
> What about... for example... this sequence:
>
> gpio_direction_output(gpio, 1);
> val = gpio_get_value(gpio);
>
> What value is "val"? More importantly, what value is reflected in
> /sys/kernel/debug/gpio ? Would it indicate that it's high or low?
>
> Now, while you can make reasonable assumptions, such as "it'll return
> that the output is being driven to the requested state" or "it'll
> return the actual state of the pin", what about this instead, which
> happens on iMX hardware - "it'll _always_ return zero".
>
> Yes, iMX6 at least has this behaviour. For any output, val as above
> will always be zero, and /proc/sys/kernel/debug/gpio will always
> report that an output is zero... unless the SION bit has been set for
> that GPIO signal.
>
> The reason is that on hardware such as iMX6, reading the GPIO is done
> by reading the pad state register, and this register is _only_ supplied
> the state of the pad when the input path is enabled. The input path
> is only enabled when the output is disabled, or the SION bit is set
> to force the GPIO input path.
>
> So, this brings up three obvious questions:
>
> 1. What should gpio_get_value() return for an output?
It seems that this is pretty well specified.
To quote Documentation/gpio/gpio-legacy.txt:
>> When reading the value of an output pin, the value
>> returned should be what's seen on the pin ... that
>> won't always match the specified output value, because
>> of issues including open-drain signaling and output
>> latencies.
Documentation/gpio/gpio.txt is a little less clear, but implies
the same:
>> If you are "driving" the signal high but
>> gpiod_get_value(gpio) reports a low value (after
>> the appropriate rise time passes), you know some other
>> component is driving the shared signal low
> 2. What should be reported in /sys/kernel/debug/gpio for an output?
> 3. Should iMX6 (and similar) GPIOs always have the SION bit set in
> their DT descriptions?
>
> Discuss.
>
Each signal accessed using the GPIO subsystem **must** have
the SION bit set and the values returned should be the value
from the PSR registers.
Regards,
Eric
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list