[PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: New bus driver for the QUP I2C controller
Bjorn Andersson
bjorn.andersson at sonymobile.com
Thu Jan 16 19:18:33 EST 2014
On Wed 15 Jan 08:46 PST 2014, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/13, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * QUP driver for Qualcomm MSM platforms
> > + *
> > + */
>
> This comment seems redundant, we know what file we're looking at.
>
Indeed.
> > +
> > +struct qup_i2c_dev {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > + struct pinctrl *pctrl;
>
> This is unused.
>
Removed.
> > + int irq;
> > + struct clk *clk;
> > + struct clk *pclk;
> > + struct i2c_adapter adap;
> > +
> > + int clk_freq;
>
> This is only ever used in probe, so why do we need to store it
> away?
>
Moved to probe()
> > + int clk_ctl;
> > + int one_bit_t;
> > + int out_fifo_sz;
> > + int in_fifo_sz;
> > + int out_blk_sz;
> > + int in_blk_sz;
> > + unsigned long xfer_time;
> > + unsigned long wait_idle;
> > +
> > + struct i2c_msg *msg;
> > + /* Current possion in user message buffer */
>
> s/possion/position/?
>
Thanks.
> > + int pos;
> > + /* Keep number of bytes left to be transmitted */
> > + int cnt;
> > + /* I2C protocol errors */
> > + u32 bus_err;
> > + /* QUP core errors */
> > + u32 qup_err;
> > + /*
> > + * maximum bytes that could be send (per iterration). could be
>
> s/iterration/iteration/?
>
Thanks
> > + * equal of fifo size or block size (in block mode)
> > + */
> > + int chunk_sz;
> > + struct completion xfer;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t qup_i2c_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct qup_i2c_dev *qup = dev;
> > + u32 bus_err;
> > + u32 qup_err;
> > + u32 opflags;
> > +
> [...]
> > +
> > + if (opflags & QUP_OUT_SVC_FLAG)
> > + writel(QUP_OUT_SVC_FLAG, qup->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
> > +
> > + if (!(qup->msg->flags == I2C_M_RD))
>
> Should this be?
>
> if (!(qup->msg->flags & I2C_M_RD))
>
> Otherwise it should be
>
> if (qup->msg->flags != I2C_M_RD)
>
In the codeaurora implementation this seem to be:
if (qup->msg->flags == I2C_M_RD) {
if ((opflags & QUP_MX_INPUT_DONE) || (opflags & QUP_IN_SVC_FLAG))
writel(QUP_IN_SVC_FLAG, qup->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
else
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
So, do not complete the xfer unless there's something for us.
I'll verify this and update the next version.
Thanks.
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +
> > + if ((opflags & QUP_MX_INPUT_DONE) || (opflags & QUP_IN_SVC_FLAG))
> > + writel(QUP_IN_SVC_FLAG, qup->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
> > +
> > +done:
> > + qup->qup_err = qup_err;
> > + qup->bus_err = bus_err;
> > + complete(&qup->xfer);
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +qup_i2c_poll_state(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, u32 req_state, bool only_valid)
> > +{
> > + int retries = 0;
> > + u32 state;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + state = readl(qup->base + QUP_STATE);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If only valid bit needs to be checked, requested state is
> > + * 'don't care'
> > + */
>
> It looks like req_state == 0 means only_valid == true. Can we
> drop the only_valid argument to this function?
>
In all cases but the reset in the beginning of qup_i2c_xfer, so it seems that
it has to stay.
> > + if (state & QUP_STATE_VALID) {
> > + if (only_valid)
> > + return 0;
> > + if ((req_state & QUP_I2C_MAST_GEN)
> > + && (state & QUP_I2C_MAST_GEN))
> > + return 0;
> > + if ((state & QUP_STATE_MASK) == req_state)
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (retries++ == 1000)
> > + udelay(100);
> > +
> > + } while (retries != 2000);
>
> Please makes #defines for 1000 and 2000.
>
This retry loop looks completely arbitrary to me now that you say it. I'll
revise this.
> > +
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +}
> > +
> [...]
> > +static void qup_i2c_issue_write(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
> > +{
> > + u32 addr = msg->addr << 1;
> > + u32 val, qup_tag;
> > + int idx, entries;
> > +
> > + if (qup->pos == 0) {
> > + val = QUP_OUT_START | addr;
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * Avoid setup time issue by adding 1 NOP when number of bytes
> > + * are more than FIFO/BLOCK size. setup time issue can't appear
> > + * otherwise since next byte to be written will always be ready
> > + */
> > + val = (QUP_OUT_NOP | 1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + entries = qup->cnt + 1;
> > +
> > + if (entries > qup->chunk_sz)
> > + entries = qup->chunk_sz;
> > +
> > + qup_tag = QUP_OUT_DATA;
> > +
> > + /* Reserve one entry for STOP */
> > + for (idx = 1; idx < (entries - 1); idx++, qup->pos++) {
>
> Unnecessary () here around entries.
>
Sure.
> > +
> > + if (idx & 1) {
> > + val |= (qup_tag | msg->buf[qup->pos]) << QUP_MSW_SHIFT;
> > + writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
> > + } else {
> > + val = qup_tag | msg->buf[qup->pos];
> > + }
> [...]
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>
> This ifdef is probably wrong considering that you can disable
> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME without disabling CONFIG_PM and then these
> runtime PM functions would be unused.
>
Will fix.
> > +static int qup_i2c_pm_suspend_runtime(struct device *device)
> > +{
> > + struct qup_i2c_dev *qup = dev_get_drvdata(device);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(device, "pm_runtime: suspending...\n");
> > + qup_i2c_disable_clocks(qup);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int qup_i2c_pm_resume_runtime(struct device *device)
> > +{
> > + struct qup_i2c_dev *qup = dev_get_drvdata(device);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(device, "pm_runtime: resuming...\n");
> > + qup_i2c_enable_clocks(qup);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int qup_i2c_suspend(struct device *device)
> > +{
> > + dev_dbg(device, "system suspend");
> > + qup_i2c_pm_suspend_runtime(device);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int qup_i2c_resume(struct device *device)
> > +{
> > + dev_dbg(device, "system resume");
> > + qup_i2c_pm_resume_runtime(device);
> > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(device);
> > + pm_request_autosuspend(device);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
> > +
> > +static const struct dev_pm_ops qup_i2c_qup_pm_ops = {
> > + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(
> > + qup_i2c_suspend,
> > + qup_i2c_resume)
> > + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(
> > + qup_i2c_pm_suspend_runtime,
> > + qup_i2c_pm_resume_runtime,
> > + NULL)
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct of_device_id qup_i2c_dt_match[] = {
>
> const?
>
Sure
> > + {.compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup"},
> > + {}
> > +};
>
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qup_i2c_dt_match)?
>
OK
Thanks Stephen!
// Bjorn
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list