[PATCH 3/4] spi: sunxi: Add Allwinner A31 SPI controller driver
Maxime Ripard
maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com
Thu Jan 16 16:12:01 EST 2014
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 07:40:03PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:11:24PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> Looks pretty clean, a few fairly small things below.
>
> > +- clocks: phandle to the clocks feeding the SPI controller. Two are
> > + needed:
> > + - "ahb": the gated AHB parent clock
> > + - "mod": the parent module clock
>
> I guess you should specify that this needs to be done with clock-names
> too then?
Yep, right.
> > --- a/drivers/spi/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/Makefile
> > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI) += spi-sh-hspi.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF) += spi-sh-msiof.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_SH_SCI) += spi-sh-sci.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_SIRF) += spi-sirf.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += spi-sun6i.o
>
> I would expect a new Kconfig symbol for this.
Hmmm, yeah, sorry, some hacky leftover.
> > +static inline void sun6i_spi_drain_fifo(struct sun6i_spi *sspi, int len)
> > +{
> > + u32 reg, cnt;
> > + u8 byte;
> > +
> > + /* See how much data are available */
>
> data is available.
>
> > + while (len--) {
> > + byte = readb(sspi->base_addr + SUN6I_RXDATA_REG);
> > + if (sspi->rx_buf)
> > + *sspi->rx_buf++ = byte;
> > + }
>
> It seems like this hardware is only able to handle bidirectional
> operation - this is actually quite common and isn't always as simple as
> it is here. Can I persuade you to put something in the core which
> provides dummy data buffers for this case? I was thinking flags like
> must_tx and must_rx or something but didn't get around to this yet.
I'm pretty sure It can support unidirectionnal operations as well. I
just didn't found out how yet. There's actually three counters to set
whenever I setup the transfer, two of them seem to be to set the
number of bytes to send, and the last one the overall number of bursts
to set on the clock line, so I guess that we can either set it only in
RX (with the first two to 0, the last one to spi_transfer->len), only
in TX or both (by programming all three to spi_transfer->len).
> > +static int sun6i_spi_finish_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
> > + struct spi_transfer *tfr,
> > + bool cs_change)
> > +{
> > + struct sun6i_spi *sspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
> > +
> > + sun6i_spi_drain_fifo(sspi, SUN6I_FIFO_DEPTH);
> > +
> > + if (tfr->delay_usecs)
> > + udelay(tfr->delay_usecs);
>
> If you implement this using transfer_one() (as you should) the core will
> do this for you.
Oh, nice. I overlooked it.
> > + if (status & SUN6I_INT_CTL_RF_OVF) {
> > + sun6i_spi_drain_fifo(sspi, SUN6I_FIFO_DEPTH);
> > + sun6i_spi_write(sspi, SUN6I_INT_STA_REG, SUN6I_INT_CTL_RF_OVF);
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > + }
>
> This looks like an overflow - a log message would be helpful for users
> and you should possibly be flagging an error on the current transfer.
Hmmm, that was an attempt at receiving more bytes than the FIFO can
handle, but I guess the FIFO full interrupt would be more appropriate
for this.
> > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + sspi->base_addr = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
> > + if (!sspi->base_addr) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to remap IO\n");
> > + ret = -ENXIO;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
>
> devm_ioremap_resource() is nicer in that it returns an error and then
> you don't need to log either since it's noisy itself.
Ack.
> > + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (irq < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No spi IRQ specified\n");
> > + ret = -ENXIO;
>
> Don't overwrite the error code.
Ack.
> > + ret = clk_set_rate(sspi->mclk, 100000000);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't change module clock rate\n");
> > + goto err2;
> > + }
>
> Does this really need to be fatal (or done at all)? There seems to be
> another reasonably flexible divider in the IP and it's more common to
> either set this per transfer to something that rounds nicely or just use
> the default and rely on the dividers.
The default parent of the module clock runs at 24MHz, that means that
we won't be able to reach a spi clock higher than 12MHz, which seems
quite low. We can always change the rate in the transfer setup code
though, if needs be.
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(sspi->mclk);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't enable clock 'ahb spi'\n");
> > + goto err2;
> > + }
>
> I would recommend moving these to runtime PM so the clocks are only
> active when the device is actually in use, the core will do the runtime
> PM management if you set auto_runtime_pm so it's really easy to
> implement.
Ok, nice.
> > + ret = reset_control_deassert(sspi->rstc);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't deassert the device from reset\n");
> > + goto err3;
> > + }
> > +
> > + sun6i_spi_write(sspi, SUN6I_GBL_CTL_REG,
> > + SUN6I_GBL_CTL_BUS_ENABLE | SUN6I_GBL_CTL_MASTER | SUN6I_GBL_CTL_TP);
>
> Similarly here the IP could be kept in reset when not in use.
Ok.
Thanks a lot!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140116/59276491/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list