[RFC 0/2] Early patches to get rid of meminfo

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On 15 January 2014 19:01, Laura Abbott <lauraa at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 1/15/2014 5:50 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>
>> Hi Laura,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:55:20PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>
>>> With the move away from bootmem and the convergence on memblock, it seems
>>> like meminfo should be deprecated as well to avoid duplication. This is
>>> a first pass attempt to just use memblock and not have meminfo
>>> integrated.
>>> There is still a major issue in terms of actually specifying mem at location
>>> on the command line but I wanted to send this out for some early feedback
>>> before putting any more effort into this. I've done basic boot testing on
>>> a simple DT target.
>>
>>
>> I can't see 1/2 and 2/2 - either in my inbox or in the archive.
>> Could you resend?
>>
>> /
>>      Leif
>
>
>
> The patches are being held for moderation because apparently they have "a
> suspicious header". Not sure how the cover letter made it through but the
> patches didn't. If they don't get approved by end of the day I'll try
> re-sending.
>

Hi Laura,

This is a known issue that is triggered by the fact that the word
PATCH is missing from your subject line.
Could you resend but replace 'RFC' with 'RFC PATCH' ?

-- 
Ard.