[PATCH 1/2] clk: hisilicon: add hi3620_mmc_clks

[Kevin Hilman]

Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org> writes:

> Quoting Haojian Zhuang (2014-01-14 21:59:40)
>> 
>> On 01/15/2014 11:53 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> > Quoting zhangfei (2014-01-14 17:40:25)
>> >> Dear Mike
>> >>
>> >> On 01/15/2014 04:17 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> >>> Quoting Zhangfei Gao (2014-01-13 01:14:28)
>> >>>> Suggest by Arnd: abstract mmc tuning as clock behavior,
>> >>>> also because different soc have different tuning method and registers.
>> >>>> hi3620_mmc_clks is added to handle mmc clock specifically on hi3620.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao at linaro.org>
>> >>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
>> >>>> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com>
>> >>> Patch looks good to me with one exception. I do not have
>> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt in the
>> >>> clk-next branch. Is there a stable branch I can pull in as a dependency?
>> >> Mach-hisi just have been uploaeded.
>> >> Have tried next-20140114, the patch can be applied successfully.
>> >> While v3.13-rc8 still can not.
>> >>
>> >> Is this fine?
>> > Can you give me a link to the branch that introduces
>> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt?
>> >
>> > I guess the patch introducing it is going through arm-soc. Is this going
>> > in for 3.14? If so then perhaps the clk tree and the arm-soc tree can
>> > share a stable branch that introduces it.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Mike
>> >
>> Some patches are merged into arm-soc, and others are in clk tree.
>> If sharing a stable branch between arm-soc and clk tree, it only means
>> that we need to revert all commits that are in arm-soc and clk tree.
>> I think it's too complex.
>
> I'm suggesting reverting any patches that are applied to arm-soc. I'm
> only suggesting that there might be a common branch that both the clk
> and arm-soc trees can depend on to fix this problem.

This one is stable, and is where the binding is introduced:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git hisi/soc

>> How about split the patch? The patch on document should enter in arm-soc.
>
> That is one approach. You might want to run it past the arm-soc folks
> first to see if they will take in the binding definition for 3.14.

We're not taking anything new for 3.14.

Kevin