[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: share drm_add_fake_info_node

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Jan 15 03:39:20 EST 2014


On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:25:10AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:14:06AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> > Both i915 and Armada had the exact same implementation. For an upcoming
>> > patch, I'd like to call this function from two different source files in
>> > i915, and having it available externally helps there too.
>> >
>> > While moving, add 'debugfs_' to the name in order to match the other drm
>> > debugfs helper functions.
>> >
>> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
>>
>> drm_debugfs_create_files in drm_debugfs.c has the almost same code again.
>> Now the problem here is that the interface is a bit botched up, since all
>> the users in i915 and armada actaully faile to clean up teh debugfs dentry
>> if drm_add_fake_info_node.
>
> That's not correct - armada does clean up these, I think you need to
> take a closer look at the code.
>
> We do this by setting node->info_ent to the file operations structure,
> which is a unique key to the file being registered.
>
> Upon failure to create the fake node, we appropriately call
> drm_debugfs_remove_files() with the first argument being a pointer to
> the file operations.  This causes drm_debugfs_remove_files() to match
> the fake entry, call debugfs_remove() on the dentry, and remove the
> node from the list, and free the node structure we allocated.
>
> Upon driver teardown, we also call drm_debugfs_remove_files() but with
> each fops which should be registered, thus cleaning up each fake node
> which was created.
>
> So, Armada does clean up these entries properly.

Indeed I've missed that and it's just i915 that botches this. I still
think the helper would be saner if it cleans up all its leftovers in
the failure case.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list