[RFC PATCH] clk: composite: support determine_rate using rate_ops->round_rate + mux_ops->set_parent
Mike Turquette
mturquette at linaro.org
Tue Jan 14 15:41:46 EST 2014
Quoting Boris BREZILLON (2014-01-07 09:03:52)
> In case the rate_hw does not implement determine_rate, but only round_rate
> we fallback to best_parent selection if mux_hw is present and support
> reparenting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon at overkiz.com>
Hi Boris,
Since this change affects users of the composite clock type I will hold
off reviewing/applying this patch until after the merge window.
Thanks,
Mike
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
> index 753d0b7..d3cf49a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
> @@ -64,11 +64,57 @@ static long clk_composite_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> const struct clk_ops *mux_ops = composite->mux_ops;
> struct clk_hw *rate_hw = composite->rate_hw;
> struct clk_hw *mux_hw = composite->mux_hw;
> + struct clk *parent;
> + unsigned long parent_rate;
> + long tmp_rate;
> + unsigned long rate_diff;
> + unsigned long best_rate_diff = ULONG_MAX;
> + int i;
>
> if (rate_hw && rate_ops && rate_ops->determine_rate) {
> rate_hw->clk = hw->clk;
> return rate_ops->determine_rate(rate_hw, rate, best_parent_rate,
> best_parent_p);
> + } else if (rate_hw && rate_ops && rate_ops->round_rate &&
> + mux_hw && mux_ops && mux_ops->set_parent) {
> + *best_parent_p = NULL;
> +
> + if (__clk_get_flags(hw->clk) & CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT) {
> + *best_parent_p = clk_get_parent(mux_hw->clk);
> + *best_parent_rate = __clk_get_rate(*best_parent_p);
> +
> + return rate_ops->round_rate(rate_hw, rate,
> + best_parent_rate);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < __clk_get_num_parents(mux_hw->clk); i++) {
> + parent = clk_get_parent_by_index(mux_hw->clk, i);
> + if (!parent)
> + continue;
> +
> + parent_rate = __clk_get_rate(parent);
> +
> + tmp_rate = rate_ops->round_rate(rate_hw, rate,
> + &parent_rate);
> + if (tmp_rate < 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (tmp_rate < rate)
> + rate_diff = rate - tmp_rate;
> + else
> + rate_diff = tmp_rate - rate;
> +
> + if (!rate_diff || !*best_parent_p || best_rate_diff > rate_diff) {
> + *best_parent_p = parent;
> + *best_parent_rate = parent_rate;
> + best_rate_diff = rate_diff;
> + }
> +
> + if (!rate_diff)
> + return rate;
> + }
> +
> + return best_rate_diff;
> } else if (mux_hw && mux_ops && mux_ops->determine_rate) {
> mux_hw->clk = hw->clk;
> return mux_ops->determine_rate(rate_hw, rate, best_parent_rate,
> @@ -196,7 +242,8 @@ struct clk *clk_register_composite(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> composite->rate_hw = rate_hw;
> composite->rate_ops = rate_ops;
> clk_composite_ops->recalc_rate = clk_composite_recalc_rate;
> - if (rate_ops->determine_rate)
> + if (rate_ops->determine_rate ||
> + (rate_ops->round_rate && clk_composite_ops->set_parent))
> clk_composite_ops->determine_rate = clk_composite_determine_rate;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list