[PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq driver depends on SOC_IMX6Q/SOC_IMX6SL

[John Tobias]

That's ok.

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:39:52PM -0800, John Tobias wrote:
>> The ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, HAVE_IMX_ANATOP and PM_OPP are moved up to ARCH_MCX.
>> The driver should show if the SOC_IMX6Q and/or SOC_IMX6SL is/are selected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Tobias <john.tobias.ph at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>> index 3ba5dcc..230c663 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ config ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ
>>
>>  config ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ
>>       tristate "Freescale i.MX6 cpufreq support"
>> -     depends on ARCH_MXC
>> +     depends on SOC_IMX6Q || SOC_IMX6SL
>
> No.  We do not want to touch this line where there is another IMX6xx can
> reuse the driver.  Depending on ARCH_MXC is good enough, since we
> already have the symbol prompt and help text to tell the targets that
> the driver supports.
>
> Shawn
>
>>       depends on REGULATOR_ANATOP
>>       help
>>         This adds cpufreq driver support for Freescale i.MX6 series SoCs.
>> --
>> 1.8.3.2
>>
>