[PATCHv13 00/40] ARM: TI SoC clock DT conversion

[Tero Kristo]

On 01/10/2014 08:53 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org> [140109 14:25]:
>> Quoting Tero Kristo (2014-01-09 06:00:11)
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So, bad luck number release for this, as v12 wasn't sufficient still.
>>>
>>> Changes compared to previous version:
>>> - Dropped any changes to generic clock drivers, as it seems impossible
>>>    to agree anything in short term, this means the patch set shrank in
>>>    size from 49 patches to 40 (first 9 patches were dropped).
>>> - Copy pasted implementation for clk-divider and clk-mux from drivers/clk
>>>    to drivers/clk/ti, and made the modifications needed to the TI version
>>>    of the clock drivers only (based on discussions with Mike, this is fine)
>>> - Changed name of clk_ll_ops to ti_clk_ll_ops so that this doesn't conflict
>>>    with any generic implementation we might have at some point, migrating
>>>    this to the generic version should be easy enough also.
>>> - Fixed trace_clk_div_div_ck for omap4, this node was broken in previous
>>>    versions and resulted into an orphan clock node
>>> - Fixed compile problem for omap5 only build reported by Felipe
>>> - Fixed a couple of sparse warnings
>>> - changed the mach-omap2/clock.c to use readl_relaxed / writel_relaxed
>>>    instead of __raw_readl / __raw_writel
>>
>> Hi Tero,
>>
>> This approach takes care of all of my concerns with this series. Thanks
>> for your long suffering patience on it.
>>
>> It seems some build errors are cropping up, so once those are fixed then
>> I'll be happy to merge clk-next-dt-clks-v13 into clk-next for 3.14.
>
> I'm fine with Mike merging these all via the clock tree assuming no more
> pending comments. For the patches changed from the last time around,
> please feel free to add:
>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>

How about the dts data patches? Should these also go via Mike's tree? 
Otherwise we will have boot failures until the dts patches are merged.

-Tero