linux-next: manual merge of the sh tree with the tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:47:24 +0900 Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:11:03PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> > The request to merge the sh code came through Simon with claimed
> > agreement from SH maintainers to do so -- I didn't verify this since
> > they have in the past been well-coordinated. Simon?
> 
> I spoke with Paul recently and my understanding is that
> he hasn't been actively working in this area for over a year now.
> 
> I guess there are some stale patches in his tree.

That is certainly what it looks like.  So, do I remove the sh{,.-current)
trees (git://github.com/pmundt/linux-sh.git#sh-{latest,fixes-for-linus})
from linux-next permanently?  Will it be cleaned up any time soon?

Is anyone maintaining/supporting sh now?  Is it a candidate for pruning?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140110/16f407ca/attachment.sig>