[PATCH 2/5] ARM: kprobes-test: use <asm/opcodes.h> for instruction accesses

[Jon Medhurst (Tixy)]

On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 12:54 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
> On 3 January 2014 17:53, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 18:19 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
> >> From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks at codethink.co.uk>
> >>
> >> Ensure we read instructions in the correct endian-ness by using
> >> the <asm/opcodes.h> helper to transform them as necessary.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks at codethink.co.uk>
> >> [taras.kondratiuk at linaro.org: fix next_instruction() function]
> >> Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk at linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >
> > Apart from the spurious line removal (see below) then:
> >
> > Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy at linaro.org>
> >
> > and you can include an ACK for the other patches in this series too.
> >
> > Thanks.
> 
> >> @@ -1593,7 +1594,6 @@ static int run_test_cases(void (*tests)(void), const union decode_item *table)
> >>       return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -
> >
> > I know the above blank line isn't needed but I believe the convention is
> > to avoid doing unrelated white-space clean-ups in patches.
> 
> Right, I will remove it.
> Should this series go through Russell's patch tracking system or it
> can be pulled
> to some tree?

I would assume as a pull request sent to Russell using the email alias
he uses for these things: linux+pull at arm.linux.org.uk I'm sure he's
shout up if I'm wrong...

-- 
Tixy