[PATCH v2 0/8] clk: max77686: Clock provider implementation fixes
Tomasz Figa
tomasz.figa at gmail.com
Wed Jan 8 17:03:41 EST 2014
On Wednesday 08 of January 2014 13:54:32 Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-01-08 10:04:57)
> > On Wednesday 08 of January 2014 09:59:39 Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > Quoting Lee Jones (2014-01-08 09:15:44)
> > > > > I believe Lee has already applied this one, but in future, to avoid such
> > > > > confusion, if it's more convenient for you, I can send you any clock
> > > > > series as pull requests.
> > > >
> > > > Me? I haven't applied any clk patches.
> > >
> > > I have taken patches 1-7 into clk-next just now.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > I can take patch #8 as
> > > well but it would probably be better to send it through arm-soc?
> >
> > Hmm, patch 8 is trivial enough to not cause any merge conflicts, but since
> > it's unlikely that any users depending on introduced changes will show up
> > for 3.14 it shouldn't really matter which tree it goes through...
>
> In the absence of any strong opinion on the topic I have taken patch #8
> into clk-next for 3.14.
Great, thanks.
Best regards,
Tomasz
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list