[PATCH v3 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch

[Santosh Shilimkar]

On Tuesday 07 January 2014 11:06 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 January 2014 11:22 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Sekhar,
>>
>> On Tuesday 24 December 2013 06:41 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse
>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci.
>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports:
>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines;
>>> - only unbanked irqs;
>>>
>>> See Documentation:
>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf
>>>
>>> This series based on:
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nsekhar/linux-davinci.git/log/?h=v3.14/gpio
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - fixed code, changed by mistake; fixed sparse warning 
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - minor comments applied, no functional changes
>>>
>>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/18/135
>>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/12/366
>>>
>>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar at ti.com>
>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>>>
>>> Grygorii Strashko (2):
>>>   gpio: davinci: don't create irq_domain in case of unbanked irqs
>>>   gpio: davinci: reuse for Keystone SoC
>>>
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt      |    4 +-
>>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c                        |   82 ++++++++++++++------
>>>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Have you picked up the $subject series in your queue ?
> 
> Not yet, at least on the new compatible introduction, I need an ack from
> DT folks.
> 
I noticed that but the usual 2 weeks period to get ack is over I guess ;-)
The DT part is really trivial as well but I let you decide.

> I am happy with the patches though and have tested them as well, In case
> I do not get an ack from 2/2 in time, I can at least send 1/2 for
> inclusion after my first gpio pull request to ARM-SoC gets pulled.
>
Would be great to get both of them but if not both at least 1/2.

Regards,
Santosh