[PATCH 0/4] arm64 topology support

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 06:23:55PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 06:05:45PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:

> > I think cpu-map must only contain cluster nodes as descendant children. This
> > to prevent creative DTs with cluster and core nodes at top topology level.
> > Overall it makes sense, cores can only exist in a cluster container, might
> > seem churn but at least that's strict.

> That still leaves the question of what you want to happen with such
> maps.

I've implemented a warning for this; it seems more constructive than
rejecting such DTs outright.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140107/d23d963f/attachment.sig>