[PATCH] the eDMA support for the LPUART send driver
Yao Yuan
yao.yuan at freescale.com
Tue Jan 7 04:49:02 EST 2014
Thanks for your suggestion.
I will fix those errors and also add the "jpg" in the next version.
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd at arndb.de]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 10:45 PM
To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: Yuan Yao-B46683; gregkh at linuxfoundation.org; linux-serial at vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] the eDMA support for the LPUART send driver
On Friday 27 December 2013, Yuan Yao wrote:
> This patch add eDMA support for LPUART send function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan at freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi | 12 +++
> drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c | 187
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
Not sure if this got applied already, but you are missing the respective change to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.txt.
Please document the dma-names you use here. While you are at it, please also add the "ipg" clock-name.
Arnd
> +static int fsl_request_dma(struct uart_port *port) {
> + struct lpuart_port *sport = container_of(port,
> + struct lpuart_port, port);
> + struct dma_chan *tx_chan;
> + struct dma_slave_config dma_tx_sconfig;
> + dma_addr_t dma_phys;
> + unsigned char *dma_buf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + tx_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(sport->port.dev, "lpuart-tx");
> +
> + if (!tx_chan) {
> + dev_err(sport->port.dev, "Dma TX channel request failed!\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + dma_phys = dma_map_single(sport->port.dev,
> + sport->port.state->xmit.buf,
> + UART_XMIT_SIZE, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
This is wrong: Since the dma is performed by the dma engine rather than the uart, the first argument here needs to be the dma device pointer. In fact, dma_map_single is normally supposed to fail on the uart device as the dma_mask value should be zero. Not sure why this worked.
> + if (!dma_phys) {
> + dev_err(sport->port.dev, "Dma_phys single failed\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
Please also change all references to "phys" -- it's not a phys address but a bus address. These are often the same, but that's not for the driver to know.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list