[PATCH 2/2] phy-core: Don't propagate -ENOSUPP from phy_pm_runtime_get_sync to caller
Kishon Vijay Abraham I
kishon at ti.com
Tue Jan 7 03:58:07 EST 2014
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 02:26 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 06 January 2014 04:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The phy-core allows phy_init and phy_power_on to be called multiple times,
>> but before this patch -ENOSUPP from phy_pm_runtime_get_sync would be
>> propagated to the caller for the 2nd and later calls.
>
> Thanks for fixing this. Have one minor comment below.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>> index d7b992e..8ee6157 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>> @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ int phy_init(struct phy *phy)
>> dev_err(&phy->dev, "phy init failed --> %d\n", ret);
>> goto out;
>> }
>> - }
>> + } else
>> + ret = 0; /* Override possible ret == -ENOTSUPP */
>
> 'should use braces in both branches'.
ah.. Sergei had already commented :-)
>>
>> out:
>> mutex_unlock(&phy->mutex);
>> @@ -209,7 +210,8 @@ int phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>> dev_err(&phy->dev, "phy poweron failed --> %d\n", ret);
>> goto out;
>> }
>> - }
>> + } else
>> + ret = 0; /* Override possible ret == -ENOTSUPP */
>
> same here..
>
> Thanks
> Kishon
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list