[RFC PATCH 1/3] pci: APM X-Gene PCIe controller driver
Tanmay Inamdar
tinamdar at apm.com
Mon Jan 6 21:45:11 EST 2014
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com> wrote:
> On Monday, December 23, 2013 5:02 PM, Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds the AppliedMicro X-gene SOC PCIe controller driver.
>> APM X-Gene PCIe controller supports maximum upto 8 lanes and
>> GEN3 speed. X-Gene has maximum 5 PCIe ports supported.
>
> (+cc Jason Gunthorpe, Arnd Bergmann)
>
> Hi Tanmay Inamdar,
>
> I added some minor comments. :-)
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar at apm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 5 +
>> drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-xgene.c | 1017 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Would you change the file name to 'pci-xgene.c'?
> Now, all PCI host drivers are using the prefix 'pci-', not 'pcie-'.
I guess designware is an exception. There is
"drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c"
>
> [.....]
>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk-private.h>
>
> Would you re-order these headers alphabetically?
> It enhances the readability.
ok.
>
> [.....]
>
>> +static int xgene_pcie_parse_map_ranges(struct xgene_pcie_port *port)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np = port->node;
>> + struct of_pci_range range;
>> + struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>> + struct device *dev = port->dev;
>> + u32 cfg_map_done = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, np)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "missing ranges property\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Get the I/O, memory, config ranges from DT */
>> + for_each_of_pci_range(&parser, &range) {
>> + struct resource *res = NULL;
>> + u64 restype = range.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS;
>> + u64 end = range.cpu_addr + range.size - 1;
>> + dev_dbg(port->dev, "0x%08x 0x%016llx..0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx\n",
>> + range.flags, range.cpu_addr, end, range.pci_addr);
>> +
>> + switch (restype) {
>> + case IORESOURCE_IO:
>> + res = &port->res[XGENE_IO];
>> + of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, np, res);
>> + xgene_pcie_setup_ob_reg(port->csr_base, OMR1BARL,
>> + XGENE_IO, res);
>> + break;
>> + case IORESOURCE_MEM:
>> + res = &port->res[XGENE_MEM];
>> + of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, np, res);
>> + xgene_pcie_setup_ob_reg(port->csr_base, OMR2BARL,
>> + XGENE_MEM, res);
>> + break;
>> + case 0:
>> + if (!cfg_map_done) {
>> + /* config region */
>> + if (port->type == PTYPE_ROOT_PORT) {
>> + ret = xgene_pcie_map_cfg(port, &range);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + cfg_map_done = 1;
>> + } else {
>> + /* msi region */
>> + res = &port->res[XGENE_MSI];
>> + of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, np, res);
>
> As Jason Gunthorpe said, the DT 'range' property should not
> handle MSI. Please refer to other PCI host drivers such as
> pci-mvebu.c, pci-tegra.c and pcie-designware.c.
Right. I will remove MSI from ranges.
>
> Currently, 'struct msi_chip', ' struct irq_domain' are used
> for implementing MSI feature.
>
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list