[GIT PULL 2nd 5/5] Samsung SoC update for v3.14

[Kukjin Kim]

Sachin Kamat wrote:
> 
> Hi Olof,
> 
> On 29 December 2013 04:47, Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:23:57AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >> The following changes since commit
> 538cfbb4c40ab59688236484138133b8e3e89220:
> >>
> >>   ARM: dts: Add initial support for Arndale Octa board (2013-12-16
> >> 05:05:43 +0900)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> >> tags/samsung-soc-2
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to
7a28f198735d040f4d318511827d913d4b53f355:
> >>
> >>   ARM: dts: add board dts file for EXYNOS4412 based TINY4412 board
> >> (2013-12-19 05:34:26 +0900)
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Samsung SoC 2nd update for v3.14
> >> - add exynos4412-tiny4412 board dt
> >>   for FriendlyARM's TINY4412 board
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Alex Ling (1):
> >>       ARM: dts: add board dts file for EXYNOS4412 based TINY4412 board
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                |  1 +
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-tiny4412.dts | 93
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  2 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-tiny4412.dts
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is really just a DT patch, and given that I didn't take the base
> patch it
> > makes sense to take this in a DT branch instead. Please resend on top of
> dt-2.
> 
> 
> The Arndale octa support patch ("ARM: dts: Add initial support for
> Arndale Octa board") is also
> just a DT patch and does not add any new platform support. It is based
> on the existing 5420
> SoC platform. Please consider pulling in that too.
> 
Sachin, in my understanding, adding 'Arndale Octa DT' is a support for new
hardware platform, so I've applied it into -soc branch. The -soc branch is
for new platform support including new SoC, new hardware, so if arm-soc
maintainers don't want to pull 'new platform' before supporting
multiplatform for exynos, we need to hold on at this moment. But I think, we
could support multiplatform for exynos soon ;-)

Thanks,
Kukjin