[PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

Stephen Boyd sboyd at codeaurora.org
Thu Jan 2 19:46:16 EST 2014


On 01/02/14 15:11, John Stultz wrote:
> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead
> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep
> enabled seqcount methods.
>
> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations
> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch.
>
> Cc: Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa at piap.pl>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w at 1wt.eu>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>,
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz at linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list