About Mail-Followup-To and Mutt [Was: Re: [ARM] Fix kernel compile error: drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c]

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 09:42:52AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> (using the lists and subscribe commands). And note that there are lists
> that consider using MFT to be good, ISTR that it applies to
> *@lists.debian.org, but cannot currently find a reference to support
> that claim. The problem is that using MFT only works if all recipents
> are using and respecting it.

No, Debian specifically wants replies to be sent to the list only but
it's not really related to Mail-Followup-To - I don't think there's a
general feeling on that within Debian but ICBW.  The thing about reply
to list predates the invention of MFT.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140102/e7c27c65/attachment-0001.sig>