Openblocks AX3-4 i2c bus lockup

[Gregory CLEMENT]

Hi Andrew,

On 31/12/2013 23:21, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> We can have this information in the same way that it is currently done
>>> by the other mvebu SoC: accessing the PCIE_DEV_REV_OFF register. In
>>> arch/arm/plat-orion/pcie.c there were functions named
>>> orion_pcie_dev_id() and orion_pcie_dev_id() to retrieve information
>>> about the CPU variant and its version.
>>
>> Depending on running pcie when calling is tricky, as it can be clock
>> gated. Maybe we should have some mach code to get the SoC revision
>> early for all SoCs. That should look for a pcie controller node,
>> enable the clock, store the revision once, and disable the clock
>> again. The callback can then return the stored value.
> 
> I think this is something we need, not just for this i2c problem, but
> for other issues, in particular, helping userspace get the right DT
> file.
> 
> We already have kirkwood-ts219-6281.dts and kirkwood-ts219-6282.dts,
> different QNAP 21X variants which differ by SoC. I will soon be adding
> kirkwood-ts419-6281.dts and kirkwood-ts419-6282.dts, once testing is
> complete.
> 
> It would be nice if the Debian installer can figure out which variant
> is needed. I don't think we currently reliably export this information
> to user space. We do print it at boot time, but there is no guarantee
> it will still be there later. lspci does not seem to show it, and that

I also think it could be useful to have a way to know the SoC ID and its
revision. But I don't know where to export it, in /proc/cpuinfo there is a
filed named Revision but I think it refers the board itself. There is also
the /sys/bus/platform/devices/soc.0/ directory which would be a good candidate
to export the SoC ID and revision.

> assumes PCIe devices are actually enabled in the DT, which for
> ts219-6181 they are not.
> 
> At the moment, PCI_MVEBU is a bool in Kconfig. It is either built in,
> or not available. That helps a little, but not too much. It could be
> the i2c driver gets probed before PCI. Also, for Dove, PCI is
> optional, since things like CuBox does not have any use of PCI.  
> 
> So maybe some mach code would be best, which directly peeks the PCIe
> registers, and twiddles the clocks as needed. We can hard code the
> addresses, and use dt_compat to determine which set of addresses to
> use, and do it from init_machine, so we don't need to worry about what
> the PCIe and clock drivers are doing.

I have just written something like that:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg297642.html


Gregory