[PATCH v3 1/1] add support for Seagate BlackArmor NAS220
Sebastian Hesselbarth
sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com
Thu Dec 25 05:08:12 PST 2014
On 22.12.2014 13:57, Evgeni Dobrev wrote:
> This patch adds support for Seagate BlackArmor NAS220.
>
> The Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 is a NAS system based on Marvell 88f6192. It has
> 32MB NAND and 128MB DRAM. It has two SATA slots, one Gigabit Ethernet port, two
> USB 2.0 ports, two buttons and three LEDs. There is a serial port available on
> the CN5 connector on the board (1 - TX, 4 - RX, 6 - GND).
>
> The only functionality still not implemented is the bi-color led on the front
> panel (status). Pins mpp22 and mpp23 control this led. Setting mpp22 to high and
> mpp23 to low results in orange color. Setting mpp22 to low and mpp23 to high
> results in blue color.
>
> The third led is wired to show the SATA activity on the two drives.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeni Dobrev <evgeni at studio-punkt.com>
Evgeni,
sorry for the late review, but I do have some nits that should
remove some inconsistencies. If we don't do it now, we'd never
change that later.
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood-nas220.dts | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood-nas220.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> index 38c89ca..8b9ad1d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_MACH_KIRKWOOD) += kirkwood-b3.dtb \
> kirkwood-lsxhl.dtb \
> kirkwood-mplcec4.dtb \
> kirkwood-mv88f6281gtw-ge.dtb \
> + kirkwood-nas220.dtb \
I am not too happy with choosing "nas220" as the base name for the
board. Can we make it a little bit more specific like
"seagate-nas220" or "blackarmor-nas220" ?
> kirkwood-net2big.dtb \
> kirkwood-net5big.dtb \
> kirkwood-netgear_readynas_duo_v2.dtb \
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood-nas220.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood-nas220.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8175f3d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood-nas220.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
> +/*
> + * Device Tree file for Seagate BlackArmor NAS220
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Evgeni Dobrev <evgeni at studio-punkt.com>
> + *
> + * Licensed under GPLv2 or later.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> +#include "kirkwood.dtsi"
> +#include "kirkwood-6192.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Seagate NAS 220";
model = "Seagate BlackArmor NAS220";
i.e. choose the same spelling in comment above and model name here.
> + compatible = "seagate,nas220","marvell,kirkwood-88f6192","marvell,kirkwood";
compatible should reflect the chosen base name above.
> +
> + memory { /* 128 MB */
> + device_type = "memory";
> + reg = <0x00000000 0x8000000>;
> + };
> +
> + chosen {
> + bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200n8";
> + stdout-path = &uart0;
> + };
> +
> + ocp at f1000000 {
> + pinctrl: pin-controller at 10000 {
v3.19 should already have a label for the common pinctrl node.
Please do not replay the bus structure but use a node reference
like &nand and friends below.
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pmx_uart0
> + &pmx_button_reset
> + &pmx_button_power>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> +
> + pmx_act_sata0: pmx-act-sata0 {
> + marvell,pins = "mpp15";
> + marvell,function = "sata0";
> + };
Insert a blank line between each of the pmx_foo nodes?
> + pmx_act_sata1: pmx-act-sata1 {
> + marvell,pins = "mpp16";
> + marvell,function = "sata1";
> + };
> + pmx_power_sata0: pmx-power-sata0 {
> + marvell,pins = "mpp24";
> + marvell,function = "gpio";
> + };
> + pmx_power_sata1: pmx-power-sata1 {
> + marvell,pins = "mpp28";
> + marvell,function = "gpio";
> + };
> + pmx_button_reset: pmx-button-reset {
> + marvell,pins = "mpp29";
> + marvell,function = "gpio";
> + };
> + pmx_button_power: pmx-button-power {
> + marvell,pins = "mpp26";
> + marvell,function = "gpio";
> + };
> + };
> +
> +
Remove extra blank line.
> + /*
> + * Serial port routed to connector CN5
> + *
> + * pin 1 - TX
> + * pin 4 - RX
> + * pin 6 - GND
> + */
Nice! Can you also clarify if TX/RX are as seen from the SoC or
remote end?
> + serial at 12000 {
Please use node references where possible, IIRC v3.19 should have
labels for serial, sata, and i2c. Avoid to replay the bus structure.
> + status = "okay";
> + };
> +
> + sata at 80000 {
> + status = "okay";
> + nr-ports = <2>;
I need some update from the other mvebu guys here: Do we have SATA
PHY nodes in v3.19 for Kirkwood already? If so, please update to the
new binding.
> + };
> +
> + i2c at 11000 {
> + status = "okay";
> + adt7476: adt7476a at 2e {
I know we have a lot of bad examples, but: node names should reflect
device function, not device name, i.e.
adt7476: thermal at 2e {
...
};
> + compatible = "adi,adt7476";
> + reg = <0x2e>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + gpio_poweroff {
> + compatible = "gpio-poweroff";
> + gpios = <&gpio0 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + };
> +
> + gpio_keys {
> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
Add a blank line between nodes.
> + button at 1{
> + label = "Reset push button";
Reduce label to "Reset" and "Power" below.
> + linux,code = <KEY_POWER>;
> + gpios = <&gpio0 29 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + };
> + button at 2{
> + label = "Power push button";
> + linux,code = <KEY_SLEEP>;
> + gpios = <&gpio0 26 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + gpio-leds {
> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
Add a blank line between nodes.
> + blue-power {
> + label = "nas220:blue:power";
> + gpios = <&gpio0 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + linux,default-trigger = "default-on";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + regulators {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pmx_power_sata0 &pmx_power_sata1>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> +
> + sata0_power: regulator at 1 {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + reg = <1>;
> + regulator-name = "SATA0 Power";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + enable-active-high;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + gpio = <&gpio0 24 0>;
Hmm, do you need "regulator-always-on" when it is GPIO controlled?
Also, gpio property could use GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH/LOW here too.
> + };
> +
> + sata1_power: regulator at 2 {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + reg = <2>;
> + regulator-name = "SATA1 Power";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + enable-active-high;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + gpio = <&gpio0 28 0>;
ditto.
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&nand {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&mdio {
> + status = "okay";
> + ethphy0: ethernet-phy at 8 {
> + reg = <8>;
> + };
Remove extra space before brace.
> +};
> +
> +ð0 {
> + status = "okay";
> + ethernet0-port at 0 {
> + phy-handle = <ðphy0>;
> + };
> +};
>
Overall, this look fine to me, with the nits taken care of
Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com>
Thanks!
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list