kernel.org - master not booting on keystone (ARM v7 Cortex A15 SoC) EVMs

[santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com]

On 12/23/14 10:05 AM, santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com wrote:
> +RMK
>
> On 12/23/14 9:36 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> CC + Santosh (Keystone maintainer)
>>
> Thanks Murali !!
>
>> On 12/23/2014 09:22 AM, Grygorii.Strashko at linaro.org wrote:
>>> On 12/22/2014 05:04 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>> On 12/21/2014 05:29 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot say anything here, but maybe the people being involved in
>>>>> 1e6b48116a950 can. I added them to Cc and didn't trim the mail for
>>>>> them.
>>>> Uwe,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for copying the commit owners. Looking forward for a response
>>>> from them.
>>>>
>>>> Murali
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Uwe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:48:02PM -0500, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/19/2014 04:25 PM, Tyler Baker wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 19 December 2014 at 13:18, Uwe Kleine-König
>>>>>>> <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>    wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:55:50PM -0500, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I have pulled the latest master from
>>>>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> tried booting on keystone k2hk and k2e EVM. The boot hangs with
>>>>>>>>> following log. Has anyone seen this? Keystone is an ARM v7 cortex
>>>>>>>>> A15 SMP platform. I am assuming master branch is broken for ARM v7
>>>>>>>>> and someone is working to address this. v3.18 booted up fine on my
>>>>>>>>> EVM.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any idea?
>>>>>>>> You forgot to attach the log?! So no, I don't have any idea. Did
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> bisect?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was my first git bisect work. git bisect showed me below commit
>>>>>> as bad commit. But it is pretty old commit. I tried reverting the
>>>>>> commit and my board booted up fine. The boot log attached below. I
>>>>>> did following until I got the bad commit. v3.18 also worked fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git bisect start
>>>>>> git bisect good<working commit>
>>>>>> git bisect bad<non working commit>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I build and test. If boots fine, I did git bisect good and if not,
>>>>>> git bisect bad until I got the bad commit. Can someone comment if my
>>>>>> bisect steps look sane? If so, what is wrong with the below commit?
>>>>>> Ours is a LPAE SoC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit 1e6b48116a95046ec51f3d40f83aff8b006674d7
>>>>>> Author: Kees Cook<keescook at chromium.org>
>>>>>> Date:   Thu Apr 3 17:28:11 2014 -0700
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       ARM: mm: allow non-text sections to be non-executable
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       Adds CONFIG_ARM_KERNMEM_PERMS to separate the kernel memory
>>>>>> regions
>>>>>>       into section-sized areas that can have different permisions.
>>>>>> Performs
>>>>>>       the NX permission changes during free_initmem, so that init
>>>>>> memory can be
>>>>>>       reclaimed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       This uses section size instead of PMD size to reduce memory
>>>>>> lost to
>>>>>>       padding on non-LPAE systems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       Based on work by Brad Spengler, Larry Bassel, and Laura Abbott.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       Signed-off-by: Kees Cook<keescook at chromium.org>
>>>>>>       Tested-by: Laura Abbott<lauraa at codeaurora.org>
>>>>>>       Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre<nico at linaro.org>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks like kernel_x_start, kernel_x_end are calculated wrongly in LPAE
>>> case.
>>> kernel_x_start == 0x0000 0000
>>> kernel_x_end   == 0x0080 0000
>>>
>>> but should be:
>>> kernel_x_start == 0x0000 0008 0000 0000
>>> kernel_x_end   == 0x0000 0008 0080 0000
>>>
>>> Below diff restores boot for me:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
>>> index cda7c40..4e6ef89 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -1329,8 +1329,8 @@ static void __init kmap_init(void)
>>>   static void __init map_lowmem(void)
>>>   {
>>>          struct memblock_region *reg;
>>> -       unsigned long kernel_x_start = round_down(__pa(_stext),
>>> SECTION_SIZE);
>>> -       unsigned long kernel_x_end = round_up(__pa(__init_end),
>>> SECTION_SIZE);
>>> +       phys_addr_t kernel_x_start = round_down(__pa(_stext),
>>> SECTION_SIZE);
>>> +       phys_addr_t kernel_x_end = round_up(__pa(__init_end),
>>> SECTION_SIZE);
>>>
>>>          /* Map all the lowmem memory banks. */
>>>          for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
>>
> Uwe,
Sorry Uwe !!
I mean to ask this question to Nicolas and RMK.

> The fix looks straight forward to me. Can you please comment if you
> think otherwise.
>

Grygorii,
Can you please add the formatted patch to RMK's patch system ?

Regards,
Santosh