[PATCH 00/27] ARM: mvebu: armada-*: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11

[Simon Guinot]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:43:00PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:11:56PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > On 19/12/2014 18:03, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 05:09:16PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > >> On 19/12/2014 17:02, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:36:13PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > >>>> On 18/12/2014 20:15, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > >>>>> ...
> > >>>>>> Jason at the end it seems you didn't ack or nack the patches were you
> > >>>>>> were CC. You expressed some concerns about the GPLv2+ move but I don't know
> > >>>>>> if it is something that prevents you to give your acked-by.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Oops.  :)  I figured my S-o-B when applying would be sufficient.  That
> > >>>>> decision was before we decided on Andrew applying patches this time
> > >>>>> around...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> For all my dts{i} contributions:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason at lakedaemon.net>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Due to all the merge commits over time and whatnot, it's probably best
> > >>>>> to put my Ack on all the patches in this series...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> OK no problem. By the way, I take care of collecting all the acked-by and
> > >>>> once it will be done I will either sent the updated patch set with all the
> > >>>> acked-by or maybe just I will create a branch to pull if it is easier to handle.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ok, that'll be up to Andrew.
> > >>>
> > >>> Once we have the last few stragglers, and assuming there are no more
> > >>> NAKs, here's what I'd like to do:
> > >>>
> > >>> Regrettably, we'll have to revert Simon's dts contributions.  I say
> > >>
> > >> You missed the email he sent yesterday, finally Simon changed his mind
> > >> and gave his acked-by.
> > > 
> > > Indeed, that was for the oneliner change in the armada-370-xp.dtsi file.
> > > I got a bit ahead of myself, but I'm looking towards kirkwood, orion5x,
> > > dove, which brings up:
> > > 
> > > 18ba7e4fe51d ARM: Kirkwood: add DT support for d2 Network v2
> > > 2d4cd2cafaea ARM: Kirkwood: allow to use netxbig DTSI for d2net_v2 DTS
> > > a96cc303e42a ARM: mvebu: update the SATA compatible string for Armada 370/XP
> > > d3dde4df4483 ARM: Kirkwood: update Network Space Mini v2 description
> > > 98d4f2acb91a ARM: Kirkwood: DT board setup for CloudBox
> > > 4ea931e07d77 ARM: Kirkwood: fix ns2 gpios by converting to pinctrl
> > > 7f9871d9d30f ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for Network Space Mini v2
> > > ca7d94524ab3 ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for Network Space Lite v2
> > > ecee1e47ab42 ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for Network Space v2 and parents
> > > 
> > 
> > OK I understand your concern now. About dove and kirkwood, did you notice that
> > some files didn't have any license?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Especially none of the dove files have a license.
> 
> Yes, we'll cross that bridge when we get there.  I suspect it then falls
> under the over-arching license of the project.  Regardless, we'll still
> need Acks from all contributors.

Hi Jason,

What is the problem with keeping the LaCie DTS files under GPLv2+ only ?

Simon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141219/35c6aa36/attachment.sig>