[PATCH] arm64: psci: Support generic pm suspend withtout CPUIDLE subsystem's help.
Lorenzo Pieralisi
lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com
Fri Dec 19 01:17:42 PST 2014
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 05:32:54AM +0000, Jonghwa Lee wrote:
> Current psci's cpu_suspend callback can be used only when common cpu idle
> configuration is enabled. However, it's also needed for system which only
> uses generic pm suspend not cpu idle. This patch modifies psci driver to
> support both of cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee at samsung.com>
NAK. Apart from:
1) being buggy (how can you use your code when both SUSPEND and CPUidle
are on)
2) not providing a patch to show how you use the API
that's not how I planned to implement system suspend, bear with me for
a couple of days and I will post an RFC publicly beginning of January.
Amit already posted a different solution and I've already replied to him:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg373447.html
Lorenzo
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
> index f1dbca7..06d5527 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,13 @@
> #define PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_STANDBY 0
> #define PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_POWER_DOWN 1
>
> +enum psci_affinity_level {
> + PSCI_AFFINITY_LEVEL_0,
> + PSCI_AFFINITY_LEVEL_1,
> + PSCI_AFFINITY_LEVEL_2,
> + PSCI_AFFINITY_LEVEL_3,
> +};
> +
> struct psci_power_state {
> u16 id;
> u8 type;
> @@ -513,27 +520,37 @@ static int psci_suspend_finisher(unsigned long index)
> {
> struct psci_power_state *state = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state);
>
> + /* Generic PM suspend without CPUIDLE functionality */
> + if (!state) {
> + struct psci_power_state s = {
> + .affinity_level = PSCI_AFFINITY_LEVEL_3,
> + .type = PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_POWER_DOWN,
> + };
> + return psci_ops.cpu_suspend(s, virt_to_phys(cpu_resume));
> + }
> +
> return psci_ops.cpu_suspend(state[index - 1],
> virt_to_phys(cpu_resume));
> }
>
> static int __maybe_unused cpu_psci_cpu_suspend(unsigned long index)
> {
> - int ret;
> struct psci_power_state *state = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state);
> - /*
> - * idle state index 0 corresponds to wfi, should never be called
> - * from the cpu_suspend operations
> - */
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!index))
> - return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (state[index - 1].type == PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_STANDBY)
> - ret = psci_ops.cpu_suspend(state[index - 1], 0);
> - else
> - ret = __cpu_suspend(index, psci_suspend_finisher);
> + if (state) {
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!index))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * If idle state initialization is successfully done,
> + * idle state index 0 corresponds to wfi, should never be
> + * called from the cpu_suspend operations
> + */
> + if (state[index - 1].type == PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_STANDBY)
> + return psci_ops.cpu_suspend(state[index - 1], 0);
> + }
>
> - return ret;
> + return __cpu_suspend(index, psci_suspend_finisher);
> }
>
> const struct cpu_operations cpu_psci_ops = {
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list