Weird/Unneeded call to msleep in exynos_mipi_dsi_wr_data in exynos_mipi_dsi_common.c
l.stach at pengutronix.de
Thu Dec 18 05:39:38 PST 2014
Am Donnerstag, den 18.12.2014, 08:35 -0500 schrieb nick:
> If we look at the code for this function, it already is handling the data correctly. In addition the locks
> seem to be better protection then msleep. Further more is no reason for this delay as we are neither resetting
> the hardware or waiting for the hardware here so why is it needed? I don't have Exynos based hardware lying
> around through to test it.
If you can't test it, don't touch it. It's that simple.
Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel