[PATCH 08/27] ARM: mvebu: armada-370-xp: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11

[Jason Cooper]

Simon,

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:22:21AM +0100, Simon Guinot wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:38:16PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > The current GPL only licensing on the device tree makes it very
> > impractical for other software components licensed under another
> > license.
> > 
> > In order to make it easier for them to reuse our device trees,
> > relicense our device trees under a GPL/X11 dual-license.
> > 
> > Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> > Cc: Arnaud Ebalard <arno at natisbad.org>
> > Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
> > Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg at uclinux.org>
> > Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Jason Cooper <jason at lakedaemon.net>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> > Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu at nigauri.org>
> > Cc: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot at sequanux.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
> > Cc: Willy Tarreau <w at 1wt.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi Gregory,
> 
> NAK for me.

Well, I'm a bit surprised that this is the first one. :)  Care to
explain why so that we can work towards an amenable compromise?

thx,

Jason.