[PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: mach-bcm: Enable I2C support for iProc

[Ray Jui]

On 12/9/2014 7:20 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 09/12/14 18:24, Ray Jui wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/9/2014 6:20 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 09/12/14 18:18, Ray Jui wrote:
>>>> Enable I2C driver support for Broadcom iProc family of SoCs by
>>>> selecting I2C_BCM_IPROC
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui at broadcom.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden at broadcom.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig |    1 +
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>>> index aaeec78..86ee90b 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ config ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>>>        select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>>>>        select ARM_AMBA
>>>>        select PINCTRL
>>>> +    select I2C_BCM_IPROC
>>>
>>> One way to avoid having to modify mach-bcm/Kconfig would be to have your
>>> i2c driver Kconfig do this:
>>>
>>> default ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>>
>>> would that work?
>>>
>> Yes. So in which case it is better to select a driver from the
>> architecture specific Kconfig?
>
> I suppose if your driver/subsystem is critical for system boot, like
> powering a regulator or something that has a critical purpose, a select
> is probably more appropriate here. If this is just exposing non-critical
> devices, I would go with a depends on/default at the driver Kconfig level.
>
> This is just how I see things, others would definitively have a
> different view.
>
Okay. Thanks. I default the driver to y in patchset v3 just like some 
other I2C drivers in the same Kconfig. It already depends on 
ARCH_BCM_IPROC so it makes sense to set the default to y, i.e., it will 
be enabled by default for ARCH_BCM_IPROC platforms.

>>
>>>>        help
>>>>          This enables support for systems based on Broadcom IPROC
>>>> architected SoCs.
>>>>          The IPROC complex contains one or more ARM CPUs along with
>>>> common
>>>>
>>>
>