[PATCH] arm64: psci: Fix build breakage without PM_SLEEP
Krzysztof Kozlowski
k.kozlowski at samsung.com
Tue Dec 9 04:38:09 PST 2014
On wto, 2014-12-09 at 13:29 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 December 2014 12:48:36 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Fix build failure of defconfig when PM_SLEEP is disabled (e.g. by
> > disabling SUSPEND) and CPU_IDLE enabled:
> >
> > arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c:543:2: error: unknown field ‘cpu_suspend’ specified in initializer
> > .cpu_suspend = cpu_psci_cpu_suspend,
> > ^
> > arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c:543:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
> > arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c:543:2: warning: (near initialization for ‘cpu_psci_ops.cpu_prepare’) [enabled by default]
> > make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/psci.o] Error 1
> >
> > The cpu_operations.cpu_suspend field exists only if ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND is
> > defined, not CPU_IDLE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com>
> >
>
> No objection to fixing this obvious build bug, but why do we even have
> an ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND option? On ARM32 we only have the respective option
> because we have a random collection of platform specific drivers that
> use the symbols, but that's not the case on ARM64.
I believe because of cpuidle. It's the same as on ARM32: the cpu_suspend
is used by both PM_SLEEP and CPU_IDLE.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list