[PATCH v5 00/61] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
Mon Dec 8 01:32:47 PST 2014

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:47:46AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:41:54PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at
> > creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so that
> > generic layers using dmaengine can actually rely on that.
> > 
> > That has been done mostly through two steps: by moving out the
> > sub-commands of the device_control callback, so that the dmaengine
> > core can then infer from that wether a sub-command is implemented, and
> > then by moving the slave properties, such as the supported buswidth,
> > to the structure dma_device itself.
> Okay managed to get this done. Apart from the two issues identified didn't
> find anything so applied and pushed to a branch
> "topic/slave_caps_device_control_fix"
> Today did some compile tests and found few warnings, were trivial but I
> am worried about the testing of this code. Has anyone tested this, if so
> which platforms are covered Since I pushed base branch last night, Feng's
> bot covered it and all was OK. Looks like Feng's bot doesn't have wide
> coverage of arm platforms, wasn't there one run by arm guys which tries to
> test and boot, if so can we get this tested there please.

Tested with your branch on sama5d3 and sama5d4 so at_hdmac and at xdmac.

I have also sent some patches based on Maxime's series for at_xdmac.


> So bit sceptical for merging now. I will send the patches which I have
> applied on top of this
> Thanks
> -- 
> ~Vinod
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list