[PATCH 2/5] gpio: Cygnus: add GPIO driver
Ray Jui
rjui at broadcom.com
Fri Dec 5 19:41:59 PST 2014
On 12/5/2014 6:34 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 18:14 -0800, Ray Jui wrote:
>> On 12/5/2014 5:28 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 16:40 -0800, Ray Jui wrote:
>>>> +static void bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
>>>> + struct irq_desc *desc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct bcm_cygnus_gpio *cygnus_gpio;
>>>> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>>>> + int i, bit;
>>>> +
>>>> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>>>> +
>>>> + cygnus_gpio = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* go through the entire GPIO banks and handle all interrupts */
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < cygnus_gpio->num_banks; i++) {
>>>> + unsigned long val = readl(cygnus_gpio->base +
>>>> + (i * GPIO_BANK_SIZE) +
>>>> + CYGNUS_GPIO_INT_MSTAT_OFFSET);
>>>> + if (val) {
>>>
>>> This if (val) and indentation isn't really necessary
>>>
>>
>> Note for_each_set_bit in this case iterates 32 times searching for bits
>> that are set.
>
> No it doesn't.
>
> #define for_each_set_bit(bit, addr, size) \
> for ((bit) = find_first_bit((addr), (size)); \
> (bit) < (size); \
> (bit) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (bit) + 1))
>
> find_first_bit:
>
> * Returns the bit number of the first set bit.
> * If no bits are set, returns @size.
>
You are right. I reviewed for_each_set_bit but didn't notice
find_next_bit may simply return 32 in our case without doing any
iterative processing. I will get rid of the redundant if (val) check below.
>> By having the if (val) check here, it can potentially save
>> some of such processing in the ISR. I agree with you that it introduces
>> one extra indent here but I think it's required.
>>
>>>> + for_each_set_bit(bit, &val, 32) {
>>>
>>> for_each_set_bit will effectively do the if above.
>>>
>>> 32 bit only code?
>>> otherwise isn't this endian unsafe?
>>>
>>
>> Will change 'unsigned long val' to 'u32 val'.
>
> All the bit operations only work on long *
>
>
Actually, by reviewing the code more deeply, I'm not sure why using
for_each_set_bit here is 'endian unsafe'. Isn't that already taken care
of by macros in bitops.h? Sorry if I'm still missing something here...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list