using DMA-API on ARM
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Fri Dec 5 10:24:43 PST 2014
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:38:39PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:11:14AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > In any case, wouldn't using a u64 type for "address" be better - isn't
> > "long long" 128-bit on 64-bit architectures?
>
> No, it's still 64-bit. There is no 128-bit integer in the C standard.
Actually, that's a fallicy.
The C99 standard (like previous versions) does not define exactly the
number of bits in each type. It defines ranks of type, and says that
lower ranks are a subrange of integers with higher ranks (for the same
signed-ness.) See section 6.2.5.
So, it merely states that:
range(char) <= range(short) <= range(int) <= range(long) <= range(long long)
So, an implementation could have:
char: 8 short: 16 int: 16 long: 32 long long: 64
char: 8 short: 16 int: 32 long: 32 long long: 64
char: 8 short: 16 int: 32 long: 64 long long: 64
char: 8 short: 16 int: 64 long: 64 long long: 64
or even:
char: 8 short: 16 int: 32 long: 64 long long: 128
and that would still be compliant with C99, since it continues to meet
the criteria about the required data types specified in the standard.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list