[PATCH] ARM: imx6: fix bogus use of irq_get_irq_data

[Vladimir Murzin]

Hi Marc,

On 01/12/14 17:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The imx6 PM code seems to be quite creative in its use of irq_data,
> using something something that is very much a hardware interrupt
        ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^
More "something" here! ;)

Vladimir

> number where we expect a virtual one.  Yes, it worked so far, but
> that's only cheer luck, and it will definitely explode in 3.19.
> 
> Fix it by using a pair of helper functions that deal with the
> actual hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h  |  4 ++--
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c     | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c |  5 ++---
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h
> index 1dabf43..66662a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h
> @@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ void imx_gpc_pre_suspend(bool arm_power_off);
>  void imx_gpc_post_resume(void);
>  void imx_gpc_mask_all(void);
>  void imx_gpc_restore_all(void);
> -void imx_gpc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d);
> -void imx_gpc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d);
> +void imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(unsigned int hwirq);
> +void imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(unsigned int hwirq);
>  void imx_anatop_init(void);
>  void imx_anatop_pre_suspend(void);
>  void imx_anatop_post_resume(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> index 1455829..5f3602e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> @@ -91,34 +91,44 @@ void imx_gpc_restore_all(void)
>  		writel_relaxed(gpc_saved_imrs[i], reg_imr1 + i * 4);
>  }
>  
> -void imx_gpc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +void imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(unsigned int hwirq)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *reg;
>  	u32 val;
>  
> -	/* Sanity check for SPI irq */
> -	if (d->hwirq < 32)
> -		return;
> -
> -	reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
> +	reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
>  	val = readl_relaxed(reg);
> -	val &= ~(1 << d->hwirq % 32);
> +	val &= ~(1 << hwirq % 32);
>  	writel_relaxed(val, reg);
>  }
>  
> -void imx_gpc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +void imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(unsigned int hwirq)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *reg;
>  	u32 val;
>  
> +	reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
> +	val = readl_relaxed(reg);
> +	val |= 1 << (hwirq % 32);
> +	writel_relaxed(val, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static void imx_gpc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	/* Sanity check for SPI irq */
> +	if (d->hwirq < 32)
> +		return;
> +
> +	imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(d->hwirq);
> +}
> +
> +static void imx_gpc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
>  	/* Sanity check for SPI irq */
>  	if (d->hwirq < 32)
>  		return;
>  
> -	reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
> -	val = readl_relaxed(reg);
> -	val |= 1 << (d->hwirq % 32);
> -	writel_relaxed(val, reg);
> +	imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(d->hwirq);
>  }
>  
>  void __init imx_gpc_init(void)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c
> index 5c3af8f..d815d1b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,6 @@ static void imx6q_enable_wb(bool enable)
>  
>  int imx6q_set_lpm(enum mxc_cpu_pwr_mode mode)
>  {
> -	struct irq_data *iomuxc_irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(32);
>  	u32 val = readl_relaxed(ccm_base + CLPCR);
>  
>  	val &= ~BM_CLPCR_LPM;
> @@ -316,9 +315,9 @@ int imx6q_set_lpm(enum mxc_cpu_pwr_mode mode)
>  	 * 3) Software should mask IRQ #32 right after CCM Low-Power mode
>  	 *    is set (set bits 0-1 of CCM_CLPCR).
>  	 */
> -	imx_gpc_irq_unmask(iomuxc_irq_data);
> +	imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(32);
>  	writel_relaxed(val, ccm_base + CLPCR);
> -	imx_gpc_irq_mask(iomuxc_irq_data);
> +	imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(32);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>