On Wednesday 27 August 2014 07:41:43 Caesar Wang wrote: > +- clock-names : Shall be "tsadc_clk" for the transfer-clock, and "tsadc_pclk" for > + the peripheral clock. > Why not just name them "clk" and "pclk"? The "tsadc" part seems highly redundant. Alternatively, how about "transfer" and "peripheral"? Arnd