[PATCH 11/11] arm64: perf: don't rely on layout of pt_regs when grabbing sp or pc
Jean Pihet
jean.pihet at linaro.org
Tue Aug 26 07:43:10 PDT 2014
Hi Will,
On 26 August 2014 16:13, Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com> wrote:
> The current perf_regs code relies on sp and pc sitting just off the end
> of the pt_regs->regs array. This is ugly and fragile, so this patch
> checks for these register explicitly and returns the appropriate field.
That is correct but costs you some code to test the index.
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet at linaro.org>
Jean
>
> Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
> index 422ebd63b619..6762ad705587 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> return regs->compat_lr;
> }
>
> + if ((u32)idx == PERF_REG_ARM64_SP)
> + return regs->sp;
> +
> + if ((u32)idx == PERF_REG_ARM64_PC)
> + return regs->pc;
> +
> return regs->regs[idx];
> }
>
> --
> 2.1.0.rc1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list