[PATCHv4 1/2] arm64: Introduce {set,clear}_pte_bit
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Tue Aug 26 07:27:07 PDT 2014
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:41:42PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index ffe1ba0..ca41449 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -149,46 +149,51 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
> #define pte_valid_not_user(pte) \
> ((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == PTE_VALID)
>
> -static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
> +static pte_t clear_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> - pte_val(pte) &= ~PTE_WRITE;
> + pte_val(pte) &= ~pgprot_val(prot);
> return pte;
> }
>
> -static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite(pte_t pte)
> +static pte_t set_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> - pte_val(pte) |= PTE_WRITE;
> + pte_val(pte) |= pgprot_val(prot);
> return pte;
> }
Why these two functions don't have an "inline"?
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list