[RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] irqchip: gic: Change irq type check when extension is present
Joe.C
srv_yingjoe.chen at mediatek.com
Fri Aug 22 22:28:58 PDT 2014
Hi,
Thanks for your suggestions.
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 12:09 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 13/08/14 03:11, Joe.C wrote:
> > From: "Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen at mediatek.com>
> >
> > GIC supports the combination with external extensions. But this
> > is not reflected in the checks of the interrupt type flag.
> > This patch allows interrupt types other than the one supported by GIC,
> > if an architecture extension is present and supports them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe.C <yingjoe.chen at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> > index 57d165e..66485ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> > @@ -194,23 +194,32 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > u32 confoff = (gicirq / 16) * 4;
> > bool enabled = false;
> > u32 val;
> > + int ret = 0;
> >
> > /* Interrupt configuration for SGIs can't be changed */
> > if (gicirq < 16)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH && type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> >
> > - if (gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type)
> > - gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type(d, type);
> > + if (gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type) {
> > + ret = gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type(d, type);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out;
> > + } else if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH &&
> > + type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> >
> > val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
> > - if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)
> > + /* Check for both edge and level here, so we can support GIC irq
> > + polarity extension in gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type. If arch
> > + doesn't support polarity extension, the check above will reject
> > + improper type. */
> > + if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK)
> > val &= ~confmask;
> > - else if (type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
> > + else if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
> > val |= confmask;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -226,10 +235,10 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> >
> > if (enabled)
> > writel_relaxed(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff);
> > -
> > +out:
> > raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static int gic_retrigger(struct irq_data *d)
> >
>
> You're really abusing the gic_arch_extn feature. I know this is
> tempting, but this is pushing it a bit too far.
>
> This feature exist for one particular reason: if your GIC is in the same
> power-domain as the CPUs, it will go down as well when you suspend the
> system, hence being enable to wake the CPU up. You then need a shadow
> interrupt controller to take over. This is exactly why we call the hook
> on every GIC-related operation.
Actually we are doing this too, it is called SYS_CIRQ in our IC, and
we'll need to support that in the future. This intpol is part of CIRQ
function block. Does it make more senses if I add skeleton for CIRQ
support, and implement intpol inside it?
> Here, you're using it to program something that sits between the device
> and the GIC. This is a separate block, with its own hardware
> configuration, that modifies the interrupt signal. This should be
> reflected in the device-tree and the code paths.
>
> You can probably model this as a separate irqchip for the few interrupts
> that require this, or have it configured at boot time (assuming the
> configuration never changes).
The boot loader did setup interrupt polarity for those used in boot
loader, but not all of them.
Datasheet lists components irqs as low active, so I think it makes more
sense to allow driver to use IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW instead of having them to
notice GIC only support high active and use IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH. This
rule out configure it at boot loader or kernel init irq time.
If I implement this as a separate irqchip, I need to reuse most gic
irqchip functions. Without changing irq-gic.c to make them global,
I can only think of hack like this:
gic_init_bases(..) /* init gic */
gic_chip = irq_get_chip(0); /* to get gic irq_chip */
org_gic_set_type = gic_chip->irq_set_type;
gic_chip->irq_set_type = mt_irq_polarity_set_type;
and calling original gic_set_type from mt_irq_polarity_set_type with irq
type fixup.
Joe.C
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list