[PATCH v7 3/8] cpufreq: kirkwood: Remove use of the clk provider API
Andrew Lunn
andrew at lunn.ch
Fri Aug 22 13:27:18 PDT 2014
> It was clearer in earlier versions of the driver, but code has been
> refactored into the cpufreq core. The core should call
> kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency() in order to get the current
> frequency, and only perform a change if the requested frequency is
> different. In the current code, kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency()
> reads from the hardware what the current frequency is. So we are
> guaranteed to only call kirkwood_cpufreq_target() when there is a real
> change.
Hi Mike
I went looking at the core.
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:__cpufreq_add_dev() contains:
if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
policy->cur = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu);
if (!policy->cur) {
pr_err("%s: ->get() failed\n", __func__);
goto err_get_freq;
}
}
So this gets the current frequency from the driver, when the driver is
added. So for the current code, this gets the real state of the
hardware.
and
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:__cpufreq_driver_target() contains:
/*
* This might look like a redundant call as we are checking it again
* after finding index. But it is left intentionally for cases where
* exactly same freq is called again and so we can save on few function
* calls.
*/
if (target_freq == policy->cur)
return 0;
/* Save last value to restore later on errors */
policy->restore_freq = policy->cur;
if (cpufreq_driver->target)
retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
and here it will only call the function to change the frequency, if it
is different from the current frequency.
Andrew
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list