Oops: 17 SMP ARM (v3.16-rc2)

Iain Paton ipaton0 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 22 03:36:11 PDT 2014


On 22/08/14 01:01, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Iain Paton <ipaton0 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> two and a half days of running this against both a sabre-lite and a
>> wandboard quad B1 and I still have no reason to think there's any
>> sort of a problem.
>>
>> Up to now, my testing has been done with my own config, I'll now
>> repeat the whole thing using the config Mattis posted to see if
>> I can reproduce it that way.
>>
>> Suggestions on a better / easier / quicker way to reproduce it are
>> welcome.
> 
> Thanks, Iain.
> 
> Mattis,
> 
> What is the silicon version of the mx6 in your sabrelite? What GCC
> version do you use?
> 

For reference, both my SL and WBQUAD report silicon rev 1.2
The RIoTboard uses a Solo and reports silicon rev 1.1

I'm using vanilla gcc 4.9.1 and compiling the kernel natively on a 
sabre-lite.






More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list