[PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: add Acer Chromebook 13 device tree

[Stephen Warren]

On 08/18/2014 06:11 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> On 08/18/2014 05:24 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/16/2014 09:20 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 13.08.2014 21:14, schrieb Dylan Reid:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Acer Chromebook 13, codenamed Big, contains an NVIDIA tegra124
>>>>>> processor and is similar to the Venice2 reference platform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The keyboard, USB 2, audio, HDMI, sdcard, and emmc have been tested
>>>>>> and work on the 1266x768 models.  The HD models haven't yet been
>>>>>> tested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WiFi does not work yet, it needs at least some PMIC changes to enable
>>>>>> the 32k clock.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The elan trackpad is not yet functional but hopefully will be soon as
>>>>>> there are patches under review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is also an issue on reboot because the TPM isn't reset.  It will
>>>>>> cause the stock firmware to enter recovery mode.  This can be worked
>>>>>> around by an EC-reset, press the refresh and power keys at the same
>>>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
>>>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 0000000..79f1852
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1136 @@
>>>>>> +/dts-v1/;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
>>>>>> +#include "tegra124.dtsi"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/ {
>>>>>> +       model = "Acer Chromebook 13";
>>>>>> +       compatible = "google,nyan-big", "nvidia,tegra124";
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In light of v1 and the above commit message referring to this as Google
>>>>> Big, shouldn't this be "google,big", "nvidia,tegra124" and optionally
>>>>> "google,nyan" as secondary string, independent of the new file name?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Despite this board having been derived from Nyan, it isn't Nyan, so I
>>>> don't
>>>> think Nyan should be part of any compatible value, nor a separate
>>>> compatible
>>>> value.
>>>
>>>
>>> "google,nyan-big" is the compatible string that the bootloader on
>>> these devices looks for.  It's also the convention we are now using
>>> for our ARM devices, as Olof has already mentioned.
>>
>> I don't understand "that the bootloader looks for"; why is the bootloader
>> doing anything w.r.t the compatible value in the DT that's passed to the
>> kernel.
>
> The ChromeOS bootloader ("depthcharge") boots FIT images and selects
> the appropriate device-tree from the image based on the compatible
> string.  On Big boards, it looks for "google,nyan-big".  This only
> becomes an issue if there are multiple device-trees in the FIT image.
> If there's only a single configuration (or you chain-load U-Boot),
> then the bootloader will boot with that configuration.  If you build a
> kernel image in the ChromiumOS environment, however, you'll end up
> with multiple device-trees (all those built by the kernel config at
> least) in the FIT image - this is what allows us to boot the same
> binary on different boards.

This just makes me dislike FIT (and DT ABIs) even more, although I 
suppose the same issue would arise if the DTBs were stored in separate 
files and looked up by filename.

I have to say this sucks, because it means that a downstream bootloader 
is imposing an ABI on the mainline kernel without a chance to fix things 
during upstreaming. For all other boards, we've concentrated on mainline 
U-Boot as the bootloader precisely so that strange behaviour of our 
downstream product kernels don't force the hand of the mainline kernel 
design.

Still, I suppose I have no choice but to drop my objection here.