[PATCH 2/6] arm/arm64: KVM: Rename irq_active to irq_queued
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Thu Aug 14 05:18:44 PDT 2014
Hi Christoffer,
On Thu, Jul 10 2014 at 3:39:52 pm BST, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org> wrote:
> We have a special bitmap on the distributor struct to keep track of when
> level-triggered interrupts are queued on the list registers. This was
> named irq_active, which is confusing, because the active state of an
> interrupt as per the GIC spec is a different thing, not specifically
> related to edge-triggered/level-triggered configurations but rather
> indicates an interrupt which has been ack'ed but not yet eoi'ed.
>
> Rename the bitmap and the corresponding accessor functions to irq_queued
> to clarify what this is actually used for.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>
So to illustrate what I was going on about the first time you summitted
this patch, have a look at my below take on this. It is basically yours,
but just with the bitmap named "irq_can_sample", which is exactly what
this bitmap is about.
What do you think?
Thanks,
M.
>From b6f864841878a5509e7d03581a224e270b25dd02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:14:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm: vgic: rename irq_active to irq_can sample
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
---
include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 4 ++--
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 35b0c12..385d771 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -143,8 +143,8 @@ struct vgic_dist {
/* Interrupt 'pin' level */
struct vgic_bitmap irq_state;
- /* Level-triggered interrupt in progress */
- struct vgic_bitmap irq_active;
+ /* Can we sample the pending bit to inject an interrupt? */
+ struct vgic_bitmap irq_can_sample;
/* Interrupt priority. Not used yet. */
struct vgic_bytemap irq_priority;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
index 73eba79..1dedf03 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
@@ -60,12 +60,12 @@
* the 'line' again. This is achieved as such:
*
* - When a level interrupt is moved onto a vcpu, the corresponding
- * bit in irq_active is set. As long as this bit is set, the line
+ * bit in irq_can_sample is cleared. As long as this bit is 0, the line
* will be ignored for further interrupts. The interrupt is injected
* into the vcpu with the GICH_LR_EOI bit set (generate a
* maintenance interrupt on EOI).
* - When the interrupt is EOIed, the maintenance interrupt fires,
- * and clears the corresponding bit in irq_active. This allow the
+ * and sets the corresponding bit in irq_can_sample. This allow the
* interrupt line to be sampled again.
*/
@@ -196,25 +196,25 @@ static int vgic_irq_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
return vgic_bitmap_get_irq_val(&dist->irq_enabled, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq);
}
-static int vgic_irq_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
+static int vgic_irq_can_sample(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
{
struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
- return vgic_bitmap_get_irq_val(&dist->irq_active, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq);
+ return vgic_bitmap_get_irq_val(&dist->irq_can_sample, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq);
}
-static void vgic_irq_set_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
+static void vgic_irq_allow_sample(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
{
struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
- vgic_bitmap_set_irq_val(&dist->irq_active, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq, 1);
+ vgic_bitmap_set_irq_val(&dist->irq_can_sample, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq, 1);
}
-static void vgic_irq_clear_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
+static void vgic_irq_forbid_sample(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
{
struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
- vgic_bitmap_set_irq_val(&dist->irq_active, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq, 0);
+ vgic_bitmap_set_irq_val(&dist->irq_can_sample, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq, 0);
}
static int vgic_dist_irq_is_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
@@ -1079,8 +1079,8 @@ static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!vgic_irq_is_enabled(vcpu, vlr.irq)) {
vgic_retire_lr(lr, vlr.irq, vcpu);
- if (vgic_irq_is_active(vcpu, vlr.irq))
- vgic_irq_clear_active(vcpu, vlr.irq);
+ if (!vgic_irq_can_sample(vcpu, vlr.irq))
+ vgic_irq_allow_sample(vcpu, vlr.irq);
}
}
}
@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ static bool vgic_queue_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
static bool vgic_queue_hwirq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
{
- if (vgic_irq_is_active(vcpu, irq))
+ if (!vgic_irq_can_sample(vcpu, irq))
return true; /* level interrupt, already queued */
if (vgic_queue_irq(vcpu, 0, irq)) {
@@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ static bool vgic_queue_hwirq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
vgic_dist_irq_clear(vcpu, irq);
vgic_cpu_irq_clear(vcpu, irq);
} else {
- vgic_irq_set_active(vcpu, irq);
+ vgic_irq_forbid_sample(vcpu, irq);
}
return true;
@@ -1252,8 +1252,8 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (status & INT_STATUS_EOI) {
/*
- * Some level interrupts have been EOIed. Clear their
- * active bit.
+ * Some level interrupts have been EOIed. Allow them
+ * to be resampled.
*/
u64 eisr = vgic_get_eisr(vcpu);
unsigned long *eisr_ptr = (unsigned long *)&eisr;
@@ -1262,7 +1262,7 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
for_each_set_bit(lr, eisr_ptr, vgic->nr_lr) {
struct vgic_lr vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr);
- vgic_irq_clear_active(vcpu, vlr.irq);
+ vgic_irq_allow_sample(vcpu, vlr.irq);
WARN_ON(vlr.state & LR_STATE_MASK);
vlr.state = 0;
vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
@@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ static bool vgic_update_irq_state(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
goto out;
}
- if (is_level && vgic_irq_is_active(vcpu, irq_num)) {
+ if (is_level && !vgic_irq_can_sample(vcpu, irq_num)) {
/*
* Level interrupt in progress, will be picked up
* when EOId.
@@ -1506,6 +1506,9 @@ int kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (i < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
vgic_bitmap_set_irq_val(&dist->irq_cfg,
vcpu->vcpu_id, i, VGIC_CFG_EDGE);
+ /* Let vcpu0 also allow sampling of SPIs */
+ if (i < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS || vcpu->vcpu_id == 0)
+ vgic_irq_allow_sample(vcpu, i);
vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[i] = LR_EMPTY;
}
--
2.0.0
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list