[PATCH] Arm64: convert part of soft_restart() to assembly
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Wed Aug 13 03:58:29 PDT 2014
Hi Arun,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 08:43:21AM +0100, Arun Chandran wrote:
> The current soft_restart() and setup_restart implementations incorrectly
> assume that compiler will not spill/fill values to/from stack. However
> this assumption seems to be wrong, revealed by the disassembly of the
> currently existing code.
>
> Pseudo code for disassembly looks like
>
> soft_restart(addr)
> {
> __push_to_stack(addr)
>
> branch to setup_mm_for_reboot()
> branch to flush_cache_all() --> This is unnecessary
> branch to cpu_cache_off()
> branch to flush_cache_all() --> Not guaranteed of flushing to PoC
>
> __pop_from_stack(addr) --> Fails here as addr is not at PoC
>
> cpu_reset(addr) --> cpu_reset receives invalid reset address
> }
As I mentioned before, I think having pseudocode here is confusing.
Either we should have a real disassembly or we should drop it. I get the
following when I build a v3.16 arm64 defconfig with Linaro GCC
4.9-2014.05:
ffffffc000085224 <soft_restart>:
ffffffc000085224: a9be7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp,#-32]!
ffffffc000085228: 910003fd mov x29, sp
ffffffc00008522c: f9000fa0 str x0, [x29,#24]
ffffffc000085230: 94003b16 bl ffffffc000093e88 <setup_mm_for_reboot>
ffffffc000085234: 94003927 bl ffffffc0000936d0 <flush_cache_all>
ffffffc000085238: 94003bf2 bl ffffffc000094200 <cpu_cache_off>
ffffffc00008523c: 94003925 bl ffffffc0000936d0 <flush_cache_all>
ffffffc000085240: b00031c1 adrp x1, ffffffc0006be000 <reset_devices>
ffffffc000085244: f9400fa0 ldr x0, [x29,#24]
ffffffc000085248: f941c822 ldr x2, [x1,#912]
ffffffc00008524c: f0000061 adrp x1, ffffffc000094000 <set_mm_context+0x10>
ffffffc000085250: 91088021 add x1, x1, #0x220
ffffffc000085254: 8b010041 add x1, x2, x1
ffffffc000085258: d2c00802 mov x2, #0x4000000000 // #274877906944
ffffffc00008525c: 8b020021 add x1, x1, x2
ffffffc000085260: d63f0020 blr x1
...
The two ldrs correspond to the spilled addr variable and memstart_addr
respectively.
>
> The compiler is clearly spilling here around the cache being disabled,
> resulting in stale values being restored. As we cannot control the compiler's
Nit: double spacing here doesn't match the rest of the message.
> spilling behaviour we must rewrite the functions in assembly to
> avoid use of the stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Chandran <achandran at mvista.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 30 ++----------------------------
> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
> index 0c657bb..86be4f9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ extern void cpu_cache_off(void);
> extern void cpu_do_idle(void);
> extern void cpu_do_switch_mm(unsigned long pgd_phys, struct mm_struct *mm);
> extern void cpu_reset(unsigned long addr) __attribute__((noreturn));
> +extern void cpu_soft_restart(phys_addr_t cpu_reset,
> + unsigned long addr) __attribute__((noreturn));
> extern void cpu_do_suspend(struct cpu_suspend_ctx *ptr);
> extern u64 cpu_do_resume(phys_addr_t ptr, u64 idmap_ttbr);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index 1309d64..bf66922 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -57,36 +57,10 @@ unsigned long __stack_chk_guard __read_mostly;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__stack_chk_guard);
> #endif
>
> -static void setup_restart(void)
> -{
> - /*
> - * Tell the mm system that we are going to reboot -
> - * we may need it to insert some 1:1 mappings so that
> - * soft boot works.
> - */
> - setup_mm_for_reboot();
> -
> - /* Clean and invalidate caches */
> - flush_cache_all();
> -
> - /* Turn D-cache off */
> - cpu_cache_off();
> -
> - /* Push out any further dirty data, and ensure cache is empty */
> - flush_cache_all();
> -}
> -
> void soft_restart(unsigned long addr)
> {
> - typedef void (*phys_reset_t)(unsigned long);
> - phys_reset_t phys_reset;
> -
> - setup_restart();
> -
> - /* Switch to the identity mapping */
> - phys_reset = (phys_reset_t)virt_to_phys(cpu_reset);
> - phys_reset(addr);
> -
> + setup_mm_for_reboot();
> + cpu_soft_restart(virt_to_phys(cpu_reset), addr);
> /* Should never get here */
> BUG();
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> index 7736779..0eff5ee 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> @@ -76,6 +76,20 @@ ENTRY(cpu_reset)
> ret x0
> ENDPROC(cpu_reset)
>
> +ENTRY(cpu_soft_restart)
> + /* Save address of cpu_reset() and reset address */
> + mov x19, x0
> + mov x20, x1
> +
> + /* Turn D-cache off */
> + bl cpu_cache_off
> + /* Push out all dirty data, and ensure cache is empty */
> + bl flush_cache_all
> +
> + mov x0, x20
> + ret x19
> +ENDPROC(cpu_soft_restart)
The code change looks good to me.
Cheers,
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list