[PATCH 2/5] char: tile-srom: Remove reference to platform_bus
Chris Metcalf
cmetcalf at tilera.com
Sun Aug 10 19:38:43 PDT 2014
Thanks for the code and comments. I'm out on vacation till mid next week but I'll look at this when I get back.
Chris
> On Aug 8, 2014, at 12:35 PM, "Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll at arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 21:08 +0100, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>>>> In addition, we also have user binaries
>>>> in the wild that know to look for /sys/devices/platform/srom/ paths,
>>>> so I'm pretty reluctant to change this path without good reason.
>>> So what is the srom class for then if not for device discovery? And why
>>> do they look for them in the first place? To get relevant character
>>> device's data, if I understand it right?
>>>
>>> Maybe you could just register a simple "proper" platform device for all
>>> the sroms and then hang the class devices from it? I can type some code
>>> doing this if it sound reasonably?
>>
>> I'm not sure exactly what you mean by device discovery here.
>
>
>
>> The
>> subdirectories under /sys/devices/platform/srom/ correspond to partitions
>> in the SPI-ROM, which are software constructs created by the Tilera hypervisor.
>> By default we have three, where the first holds boot data that the chip
>> can use to boot out of hardware, and the other two are smaller partitions
>> for boot- and user-specific data. We use the /sys files primarily to get the
>> page size and sector size for the sroms, and also export other interesting
>> information like the total size of the particular srom device.
>>
>> Thank you for volunteering to write a bit of code; if that's the best
>> way to clarify this for us, fantastic, or else pointing us at existing
>> good practices or documentation would be great too.
>
> I was thinking about something like the following (warning, untested)
>
> 8<-------------------------------------------
> From c53f0a2492d6cd38d1f82d57916a6528b071e8a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll at arm.com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:32:58 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] char: tile-srom: Add real platform bus parent
>
> Add a real platform bus device as a parent for
> the srom class devices, to prevent non-platform
> devices hanging from the bus root.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll at arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tile-srom.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tile-srom.c b/drivers/char/tile-srom.c
> index bd37747..7fb0fd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tile-srom.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tile-srom.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> static int srom_devs; /* Number of SROM partitions */
> static struct cdev srom_cdev;
> +static struct platform_device *srom_parent;
> static struct class *srom_class;
> static struct srom_dev *srom_devices;
>
> @@ -350,7 +351,7 @@ static int srom_setup_minor(struct srom_dev *srom, int index)
> SROM_PAGE_SIZE_OFF, sizeof(srom->page_size)) < 0)
> return -EIO;
>
> - dev = device_create(srom_class, &platform_bus,
> + dev = device_create(srom_class, srom_parent,
> MKDEV(srom_major, index), srom, "%d", index);
> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dev);
> }
> @@ -415,6 +416,13 @@ static int srom_init(void)
> if (result < 0)
> goto fail_chrdev;
>
> + /* Create a parent device */
> + srom_parent = platform_device_register_simple("srom", -1, NULL, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(srom_parent)) {
> + result = PTR_ERR(srom_parent);
> + goto fail_pdev;
> + }
> +
> /* Create a sysfs class. */
> srom_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "srom");
> if (IS_ERR(srom_class)) {
> @@ -438,6 +446,8 @@ fail_class:
> device_destroy(srom_class, MKDEV(srom_major, i));
> class_destroy(srom_class);
> fail_cdev:
> + platform_device_unregister(srom_parent);
> +fail_pdev:
> cdev_del(&srom_cdev);
> fail_chrdev:
> unregister_chrdev_region(dev, srom_devs);
> @@ -454,6 +464,7 @@ static void srom_cleanup(void)
> device_destroy(srom_class, MKDEV(srom_major, i));
> class_destroy(srom_class);
> cdev_del(&srom_cdev);
> + platform_device_unregister(srom_parent);
> unregister_chrdev_region(MKDEV(srom_major, 0), srom_devs);
> kfree(srom_devices);
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
> 8<-------------------------------------------
>
> Would that work for you? Note that it will move the srom class devices
> one level deeper in /sys/devices/... hierarchy.
>
> Paweł
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list