OMAP baseline test results for v3.16-rc4
Ezequiel Garcia
ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com
Sat Aug 9 05:41:24 PDT 2014
On 07 Aug 10:21 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > * Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com> [140731 12:29]:
> > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >
> > > > * Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com> [140730 00:55]:
> > > > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The following patch should fix the tests above for 3530es3beagle.
> > > > > > Care to test and ack as I don't have one?
> > > > >
> > > > > 3530es3beagle retention dynamic idle tests hang on next-20140729. (Maybe
> > > > > other boards fail too - haven't tested any others).
> > > >
> > > > I just checked that today's linux next works for off-idle and
> > > > wake-up events for at least 37xx evm.
> > >
> > > I ran the full set of tests across all boards. The only board that passed
> > > the dynamic idle testing on next-20140729 was the 3730beaglexm.
> > >
> > > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/next_20140729/20140730124836/README.txt
> > >
> > > 37xxevm hangs on the first suspend entry:
> > >
> > > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/next_20140729/20140730124836/pm/37xxevm/37xxevm_log.txt
> > >
> > > If I find some extra time, I'll set up a bisection run.
> >
> > OK that sounds like some driver suspend regression that needs
> > to be tracked down. I'm seeing it on my 37xx evm also with
> > linux next too.
>
> It's commit a71e3c37960ce5f9c6a519bc1215e3ba9fa83e75:
>
> Author: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
> Date: Wed Jul 23 16:47:31 2014 -0300
>
> net: phy: Set the driver when registering an MDIO bus device
>
> mdiobus_register() registers a device which is already bound to a driver.
> Hence, the driver pointer should be set properly in order to track down
> the driver associated to the MDIO bus.
>
> This will be used to allow ethernet driver to pin down a MDIO bus driver,
> preventing it from being unloaded while the PHY device is running.
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
>
>
> What's bad is that this went in late during v3.16-rc fixes. So now v3.16
> itself is broken, and there's no way to fix it.
>
> As far as I can tell, this patch doesn't fix a regression. So no way it
> should have gone in during late -rc kernels.
>
Indeed, the commit shouldn't have landed as a v3.16-rc fix. FWIW, it was
originally intended for v3.17, but I wasn't clear enough about this when it
was submitted.
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list