[PATCH v8 05/10] ARM: arch_timer: remove unused functions
Nathan Lynch
Nathan_Lynch at mentor.com
Mon Aug 4 06:29:03 PDT 2014
On 08/04/2014 07:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 07:16:42PM +0100, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> The counter access and evtstream configuration are now done in common
>> code, so remove the now-unused arch_counter_set_user_access and
>> arch_timer_evtstrm_enable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathan_lynch at mentor.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 25 -------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
>> index 0704e0cf5571..92793ba69c40 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
>> @@ -99,31 +99,6 @@ static inline void arch_timer_set_cntkctl(u32 cntkctl)
>> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c1, 0" : : "r" (cntkctl));
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void arch_counter_set_user_access(void)
>> -{
>> - u32 cntkctl = arch_timer_get_cntkctl();
>> -
>> - /* Disable user access to both physical/virtual counters/timers */
>> - /* Also disable virtual event stream */
>> - cntkctl &= ~(ARCH_TIMER_USR_PT_ACCESS_EN
>> - | ARCH_TIMER_USR_VT_ACCESS_EN
>> - | ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_EVT_EN
>> - | ARCH_TIMER_USR_VCT_ACCESS_EN
>> - | ARCH_TIMER_USR_PCT_ACCESS_EN);
>> - arch_timer_set_cntkctl(cntkctl);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static inline void arch_timer_evtstrm_enable(int divider)
>> -{
>> - u32 cntkctl = arch_timer_get_cntkctl();
>> - cntkctl &= ~ARCH_TIMER_EVT_TRIGGER_MASK;
>> - /* Set the divider and enable virtual event stream */
>> - cntkctl |= (divider << ARCH_TIMER_EVT_TRIGGER_SHIFT)
>> - | ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_EVT_EN;
>> - arch_timer_set_cntkctl(cntkctl);
>> - elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_EVTSTRM;
>> -}
>> -
>> #endif
>
> Does these play nicely with the previous patch wrt bisection?
It should. All call sites of these are fixed up in the previous patch.
Anything in particular you're concerned about?
The entire series is intended to be bisectable; let me know if I've
missed something.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list